Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-6113/2025-KBH ECLI:DK:KBH:2026:SS0000000225 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal to maintain visit control and ban during pre-trial detention under criminal procedure rules.

Case Number SS-6113/2025-KBH
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal regarding the maintenance of visit control and a visit ban during pre-trial detention. The appellant argued that the restrictions violated their right to family contact, while the prosecution contended the measures were necessary to ensure the suspect's appearance at trial. The court ruled that the specific circumstances justified the continued restrictions despite the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Straffesagsloven § 193; Straffesagsloven § 194: The court may maintain visit control and bans during pre-trial detention if the measure is necessary to ensure the suspect's appearance at trial and does not violate fundamental rights.

Keywords

AI generated
pre-trial detention visit control visit ban criminal procedure appeal dismissal family contact appearance guarantee

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Straffesagsloven § 193
Straffesagsloven § 194
AI generated
SS-2116/2008-NAE
Court dismisses appeal regarding police letter and visit control legality after pre-trial detention. Police argued necessity for security; court found no violation. Appeal dismissed due to lack of procedural error.
SS-14996/2021-GLO
Detention conditions regarding risk of influencing proceedings were not met, leading to dismissal of the application.
SS-101465/2025-LYN
Defense counsel notification of trial date dismissed as not required by law for this case type.
SS-1460/2008-ARH
Det Danish Court of Appeal dismissed the request for continued pre-trial detention as conditions were not met.
SS-471/2010-OLR
Court extends pre-trial detention for two suspects based on their written consent and ongoing investigation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om opretholdelse af besøgskontrol og besøgsforbud under varetægtsfængsling

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) Orientering fra Domsdatabasen: Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag. Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende afgørelser. De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i Domsdatabasen.