Legislator Case Law & Legislation
BS-33557/2023-HOL ECLI:DK:HOL:2026:BS0000000208 AI generated

Court dismisses claim against accounting firm for negligence in advising company continuation, ruling statute of limitations expired.

Case Number BS-33557/2023-HOL
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim against the accounting firm for alleged negligence in advising the company's continuation. The plaintiff argued the firm failed to warn of insolvency risks, while the firm contended the claim was time-barred. The court ruled that the claim was inadmissible because the statutory limitation period had expired before the lawsuit was filed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 157, stk. 1, af Gældsbrevsloven; s. 159, stk. 1, af Gældsbrevsloven: A claim for damages based on professional negligence is barred if the statutory limitation period expires before the lawsuit is initiated.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations accounting firm liability negligence claim commercial advice insolvency warning

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 157, stk. 1, af Gældsbrevsloven
s. 159, stk. 1, af Gældsbrevsloven
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om revisionsfirmas ansvar i forbindelse med rådgivning om fortsættelse af drift i selskab, spørgsmål om forældelse

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.