Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-8187/2024-KBH ECLI:DK:KBH:2026:SS0000000076 AI generated

Court dismisses request for access to court records regarding wiretapping and surveillance decisions.

Case Number SS-8187/2024-KBH
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the applicant's request for access to court records concerning wiretapping and surveillance decisions. The applicant sought these documents to challenge the legality of the surveillance measures applied to them. The court ruled that the public interest in protecting the integrity of ongoing investigations and the privacy of individuals under surveillance outweighs the applicant's right to access these specific internal court documents.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Act on Access to Information on Proceedings; Act on Wiretapping and Surveillance: The court must balance the public interest in judicial transparency against the need to protect the integrity of investigations and the privacy of individuals subject to surveillance when granting access to records.

Keywords

AI generated
access to information wiretapping records surveillance decisions procedural secrecy public interest judicial transparency privacy protection
AI generated
SS-697/2025-OLR
Court allows wiretapping of non-suspect's phone based on probable cause of communication with suspect.
SS-552/2008-OLR
Court allows phone tapping for murder attempt but rejects broad extended tele-oplysning request due to lack of specific grounds.
SS-1252/2008-RAN
Court authorizes police wiretapping and bank data disclosure for suspected bank robbery investigation.
SS-27128/2020-KBH
Court allows postponement of notification for concluded teleinterception to protect ongoing investigation.
SS-1119/2008-VLR
Court upholds wiretapping and data disclosure ruling while striking down the silence order.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Anmodning om aktindsigt i kendelser om aflytning og overvågning

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) Orientering fra Domsdatabasen: Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag. Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende afgørelser. De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i Domsdatabasen.