Legislator Case Law & Legislation
SS-2307/2024-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2025:SS0000000533 AI generated

Vestre Landsret upholds continued remand detention under Criminal Procedure Act s. 762(1)(3) following Supreme Court ruling.

Case Number SS-2307/2024-VLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

Vestre Landsret upheld the District Court's decision to continue remand detention pursuant to section 762(1)(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The prosecution argued that the suspect posed a significant risk of absconding, while the defense contested the necessity of continued pre-trial imprisonment. The court granted the appeal because the Supreme Court had previously ruled that the specific circumstances justified maintaining detention under the cited statutory provision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Criminal Procedure Act s. 762(1)(3); The court may order continued remand detention if the suspect poses a significant risk of absconding or obstructing justice, provided the detention is necessary and proportionate to the severity of the alleged offense.

Keywords

AI generated
remand detention Criminal Procedure Act risk of absconding pre-trial imprisonment proportionality principle Vestre Landsret supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Criminal Procedure Act s. 762(1)(3)
Landsretten stadfæster byrettens kendelse om fortsat varetægtsfængsling i medfør af retsplejelovens § 762, stk.
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten stadfæster byrettens kendelse om fortsat varetægtsfængsling i medfør af retsplejelovens § 762, stk. 1, nr. 3

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.