Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 BN 34/21, 4 BN 34/21 (4 CN 2/22) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2022:030622B4BN34.21.0 AI generated

Normenkontrolle against spatial planning plans: admissibility of challenging inner-area usage objectives by landowners

Case Number 4 BN 34/21, 4 BN 34/21 (4 CN 2/22)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the applicant's complaint by vacating the appellate court's order refusing leave to appeal and admitting the appeal to the Federal Court of Justice. The dispute concerns a norm control action (*Normenkontrolle*) brought by a landowner against a spatial planning instrument (*Raumordnungsplan*), specifically challenging whether such a plan can be attacked when it sets spatial planning objectives affecting the use of the owner's property located in an inner development area. The admission of the appeal is based on the provision for significant legal questions under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, as the case involves the pivotal legal question of whether a property owner in an inner area may contest a spatial planning plan through norm control when the plan's objectives directly impact the use of their land.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Normenkontrolle against spatial planning plans: admissibility of challenging inner-area usage objectives by landowners: The dispute concerns a norm control action (*Normenkontrolle*) brought by a landowner against a spatial planning instrument (*Raumordnungsplan*), specifically challenging whether such a plan can be attacked when it sets spatial planning objectives affecting the use of the owner's property located in an inner development area. The admission of the appeal is based on the provision for significant legal questions under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, as the case involves the pivotal legal question of whether a property owner in an inner area may contest a spatial planning plan through norm control when the plan's objectives directly impact the use of their land.

Keywords

AI generated
regional land use plan property development planning permission variance duty of spatial planning zoning restrictions urban problem

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited as the legal basis for admitting the appeal on appeal against the refusal of leave to appeal.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
AI generated
4 BN 4/10
Norm control of urban planning: abstract compatibility of large-scale retail and residential use in special zones under BauNVO
4 BN 3/10
Normenkontrolle against development plan amendment: Persistence of legal interest despite full realization of land-use designations and spacing implications on adjacent properties
4 BN 27/22
Standing for norm control challenge to zoning plan by property owner: subjective rights protection under Art. 14 GG
4 BN 49/20
Determination of spatial planning objectives: Binding force of threshold values for residential land and the requirement of definitive calculation instructions in regional plans
4 CN 6/14
Standing in norm control against regional planning objectives under § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 2 BauGB

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the legal basis for admitting the appeal on appeal against the refusal of leave to appeal.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Normenkontrolle gegen Raumordnungsplan

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des Oberverwaltungsgerichts für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen vom 11. Juni 2021 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Kostenentscheidung bleibt der Schlussentscheidung vorbehalten.

Der Wert des Streitgegenstandes wird für das Revisionsverfahren vorläufig auf 60 000 € festgesetzt.

[GRUENDE]

Auf die Beschwerde der Antragstellerin wird die Revision nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zugelassen. Die Rechtssache kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob sich der Eigentümer eines im Innenbereich gelegenen Grundstücks im Wege der Normenkontrolle gegen einen Raumordnungsplan wenden kann, der ein die Nutzung des Grundstücks betreffendes Ziel der Raumordnung festlegt.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.