Legislator Case Law & Legislation
5 PB 2/20, 5 PB 2/20 (5 P 10/20) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2020:171220B5PB2.20.0 AI generated

Scope of § 48 Abs. 2 Satz 2 SächsPersVG protection for substitute personnel council members

Case Number 5 PB 2/20, 5 PB 2/20 (5 P 10/20)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of a legal appeal (Rechtsbeschwerde), overturning the Saxon Superior Administrative Court's prior non-admission decision and allowing the applicant to proceed. The dispute concerns a personnel council member’s application for permission to lodge a legal appeal regarding a labor-law matter involving staff council representation. The admission was granted based on § 88(2) of the Saxon Personnel Representation Act in conjunction with § 72(2) No. 1 and § 92(1) Sentence 2 of the Labor Court Act, citing a question of fundamental significance: whether and under what conditions substitute members of the personnel council are protected under § 48(2) Sentence 2 of the Saxon Personnel Representation Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG; Scope of § 48 Abs. 2 Satz 2 SächsPersVG protection for substitute personnel council members: The dispute concerns a personnel council member’s application for permission to lodge a legal appeal regarding a labor-law matter involving staff council representation. The admission was granted based on § 88(2) of the Saxon Personnel Representation Act in conjunction with § 72(2) No. 1 and § 92(1) Sentence 2 of the Labor Court Act, citing a question of fundamental significance: whether and under what conditions substitute members of the personnel council are protected under § 48(2) Sentence 2 of the Saxon Personnel Representation Act.

Keywords

AI generated
scope of protection administrative personnel legal representation matter in dispute rights and obligations of staff special provisions for Luxembourg

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 88 Abs. 2 SächsPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

Basis for admitting the legal appeal due to a question of fundamental significance.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Zustimmungserfordernis; Ersatzmitglieder des Personalrats

[TENOR]

Die Nichtzulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde in dem Beschluss des Sächsischen Oberverwaltungsgerichts vom 24. Oktober 2019 wird aufgehoben.

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers wird zugelassen.

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 88 Abs. 2 SächsPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Die vorliegende Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob und unter welchen Voraussetzungen Ersatzmitglieder des Personalrats vom Schutz des § 48 Abs. 2 Satz 2 SächsPersVG erfasst werden.