Legislator Case Law & Legislation
4 B 63/18, 4 B 63/18 (4 C 4/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:280619B4B63.18.0 AI generated

Wind energy mutual interference: obligation of consideration between competing installations and priority rule in mixed authorization proceedings

Case Number 4 B 63/18, 4 B 63/18 (4 C 4/19)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the appeal (Revision) filed by the co-defendant, ordering that the matter proceed to full appellate review. The dispute concerns a planning and environmental law conflict between two wind energy installations that mutually interfere with each other through wind turbulence, specifically challenging the regulatory measures and the applic of the "consideration" (Rücksichtnahme) principle in this context. The court granted leave to appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, identifying a significant legal question regarding which installation must yield to the other and whether the principle of priority applies when one facility is subject to a prior authorization procedure while the other is undergoing a general licensing procedure. The decision also provisionally fixed the value in dispute for the appeal proceedings based on the relevant cost calculation provisions of the Courts' Fees and Costs Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Wind energy mutual interference: obligation of consideration between competing installations and priority rule in mixed authorization proceedings: The dispute concerns a planning and environmental law conflict between two wind energy installations that mutually interfere with each other through wind turbulence, specifically challenging the regulatory measures and the applic of the "consideration" (Rücksichtnahme) principle in this context. The court granted leave to appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, identifying a significant legal question regarding which installation must yield to the other and whether the principle of priority applies when one facility is subject to a prior authorization procedure while the other is undergoing a general licensing procedure. The decision also provisionally fixed the value in dispute for the appeal proceedings based on the relevant cost calculation provisions of the Courts' Fees and Costs Act.

Keywords

AI generated
wind energy conflict rule matter in dispute law of obligations energy measures planning procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, serving as the legal basis for admitting the appeal (Revision) due to fundamental significance of the case.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions applied to fix the provisional value in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, serving as the legal basis for admitting the appeal (Revision) due to fundamental significance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions applied to fix the provisional value in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Rücksichtnahmegebot bei zwei sich gegenseitig beeinträchtigenden Windenergieanlagen

[GRUENDE]

Auf die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen wird die Revision nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zugelassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, welche von zwei sich gegenseitig beeinträchtigenden Windenergieanlagen im Hinblick auf Turbulenzen auf die jeweils andere Rücksicht nehmen muss, insbesondere ob und ggf. nach welchen Maßgaben der Grundsatz der Priorität Anwendung findet, wenn für die eine Anlage ein Verfahren zum Erlass eines Vorbescheides und für die andere ein Genehmigungsverfahren durchgeführt wird.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.