Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
5 PB 13/18, 5 PB 13/18 (5 P 1/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:100119B5PB13.18.0 AI generated

Admissibility of Rechtsbeschwerde in federal service law: signification of immediacy requirement under § 78(1)(1) BPersVG

Case Number 5 PB 13/18, 5 PB 13/18 (5 P 1/19)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of the appellant's appeal on points of law, effectively allowing the challenge to proceed; no substantive judgment on the merits was rendered in this decision. The dispute concerned a labor law matter under the Federal Civil Service Act (BPersVG), specifically whether the legal requirements for a particular status, including the criterion of "immediacy," had been met. The court based its decision on the provisions for admitting appeals in federal service proceedings, citing § 83(2) BPersVG in conjunction with § 72(2)(1) and § 92(1) sentence 2 ArbGG, to clarify the significance of the "immediacy" requirement in the context of § 78(1) no. 1 BPersVG.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG; Admissibility of Rechtsbeschwerde in federal service law: signification of immediacy requirement under § 78(1)(1) BPersVG: The dispute concerned a labor law matter under the Federal Civil Service Act (BPersVG), specifically whether the legal requirements for a particular status, including the criterion of "immediacy," had been met. The court based its decision on the provisions for admitting appeals in federal service proceedings, citing § 83(2) BPersVG in conjunction with § 72(2)(1) and § 92(1) sentence 2 ArbGG, to clarify the significance of the "immediacy" requirement in the context of § 78(1) no. 1 BPersVG.

Keywords

AI generated
legal status substantive requirements challenge of administrative decisions civil service matter in dispute civil judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG zuzulassen.
AI generated
RiSt 1/21
Recusal and hearing objections in federal service law: lack of legal interest and failure to substantiate violation of right to be heard
2 B 34/14, 2 B 34/14, 2 PKH 1/14
Beamtenrechtliche Disziplinarverhandlung: Verhandlungsunfähigkeit nach eigenmächtiger Sitzungsaufhebung und Substantiierungsanforderungen an Gehörsverletzungen
1 WNB 14.25, 1 WNB 14.25 (1 WNB 7.25)
Angehöriger: Zulässigkeit der Anhörungsrüge ohne anwaltliche Vertretung
XI ZB 4/23
Admissibility of Rechtsbeschwerde against refusal of court-appointed lawyer for appeal and dismissal as unstatutory
2 BvR 10/22, 2 BvR 11/22
Constitutional admissibility of civil service selection disputes: timeliness of complaint and substantiation of equal treatment claims under Art. 33(2) GG

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

Provisions cited as the legal basis for admitting the appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde).

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Unmittelbarkeit im Kontext des § 78 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 BPersVG

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG zuzulassen. Die vorliegende Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welche Bedeutung dem Merkmal der Unmittelbarkeit im Kontext des § 78 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 BPersVG zukommt.