Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2 B 21/18, 2 B 21/18 (2 C 37/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:221118B2B21.18.0 AI generated

Liability of recognized conscientious objectors for reimbursement of specialized military training costs following early termination of service

Case Number 2 B 21/18, 2 B 21/18 (2 C 37/18)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted the plaintiff's complaint and permitted an appeal to the revising instance, finding the appeal justified due to the fundamental significance of the legal question involved. The dispute concerns the reimbursement of training costs to the Federal Armed Forces by a recognized conscientious objector whose professional soldier service was terminated early, specifically regarding the extent to which such individuals are liable for costs associated with specialized training as an air traffic control officer. The decision relies on Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO) to allow the revising court to further clarify the scope of liability for training cost recovery under the Federal Pay Structure Act (SG) in cases involving early termination of service for recognized conscientious objectors.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG; Liability of recognized conscientious objectors for reimbursement of specialized military training costs following early termination of service: The dispute concerns the reimbursement of training costs to the Federal Armed Forces by a recognized conscientious objector whose professional soldier service was terminated early, specifically regarding the extent to which such individuals are liable for costs associated with specialized training as an air traffic control officer. The decision relies on Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO) to allow the revising court to further clarify the scope of liability for training cost recovery under the Federal Pay Structure Act (SG) in cases involving early termination of service for recognized conscientious objectors.

Keywords

AI generated
military service reimbursement of costs termination of service in-service training military insurance liability military disciplinary law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, explicitly cited to justify the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG
3 und § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BVerwGE 158, 364
AI generated
2 B 22/18, 2 B 22/18 (2 C 38/18)
Reimbursement of Bundeswehr training costs: liability of recognized conscientious objectors after premature termination of professional soldier service
2 C 37/18
Reimbursement of military training costs by conscientious objector: limiting liability to retained economic advantage to protect freedom of conscience
2 B 44/18
Reimbursement of military training costs following conscientious objection: scope of advantage recapture and exclusion of service credit deduction
2 C 38/18
Recovery of military training costs from a conscientious objector: limitation to the realized professional benefit
2 B 9/23
Reimbursement of military training costs governed by soldier status at time of discharge rather than training

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, explicitly cited to justify the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Erstattung von Ausbildungskosten der Bundeswehr; Zulassung der Revision

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision wird wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zugelassen.

Das Revisionsverfahren kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht im Anschluss an die bereits vorliegende Rechtsprechung (vgl. insbesondere BVerwG, Beschluss vom 14. Mai 2014 - 2 B 96.13 - Buchholz 449 § 46 SG Nr. 22 und Urteile vom 28. Oktober 2015 - 2 C 40.13 - Buchholz 449 § 56 SG Nr. 4 sowie vom 12. April 2017 - 2 C 16.16 - BVerwGE 158, 364) Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Frage geben, in welchem Umfang anerkannte Kriegsdienstverweigerer nach vorzeitiger Beendigung des Berufssoldatenverhältnisses zur Erstattung von Ausbildungskosten (hier: Fachausbildung zum Flugsicherungskontrolloffizier) herangezogen werden dürfen.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.