Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 B 24/18, 4 B 24/18 (4 C 9/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:070818B4B24.18.0 AI generated

Eligibility of private developers for expedited construction of asylum accommodation under § 246 Abs. 9 BauGB

Case Number 4 B 24/18, 4 B 24/18 (4 C 9/18)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the plaintiff's complaint and admitted the case for appeal, ruling that the lower instance's denial of leave was erroneous and setting a preliminary amount in dispute; this decision allows the plaintiff to challenge whether private developers seeking to construct facilities for housing asylum seekers and refugees fall under the expedited construction procedures of § 246(9) of the German Building Code (BauGB), thereby prioritizing the legal qualification of private actors under this specific statutory exception over the general administrative law framework.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 246 Abs. 9 BauGB, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Eligibility of private developers for expedited construction of asylum accommodation under § 246 Abs. 9 BauGB: Auf die Beschwerde der Klägerin wird die Revision nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zugelassen. In dem Revisionsverfahren wird voraussichtlich geklärt werden, ob und unter welchen Voraussetzungen Vorhaben, die der Unterbringung von Asylbegehrenden und Flüchtlingen dienen, von § 246 Abs. 9 BauGB begünstigt werden, wenn ein privater Vorhabenträger ein solches Vorhaben verwirklichen möchte.

Keywords

AI generated
asylum law housing law challenge of administrative decisions statutory basis preliminary decision unauthorized construction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 246 Abs. 9 BauGB
Revisionszulassung; Anwendbarkeit von § 246 Abs. 9 BauGB auf private Vorhabenträger
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for granting the plaintiff's complaint and admitting the revision due to significant legal questions.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited in the order regarding the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited in the order regarding the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited in the order regarding the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
4 C 9/18
Planning privilege for private refugee accommodation: public responsibility requirement under § 246 Abs. 9 BauGB
4 B 39/17
Applicability of § 246 Abs. 10 BauGB exemption to change of use of buildings in commercial areas for refugee accommodations
1 C 40/21
NGO access to asylum accommodation facilities for unsolicited legal counseling; scope of Art. 18(2)(c) Qualification Directive
4 B 2/18
Scope of immediate vicinity under § 34 BauGB and compatibility of § 246 Abs. 10 BauGB asylum accommodations with factual commercial zone character
1 BvR 2356/19
Attribution of third-party objections in building permit proceedings: Right to be heard and effective legal protection in appeal admissibility disputes

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for granting the plaintiff's complaint and admitting the revision due to significant legal questions.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited in the order regarding the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited in the order regarding the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited in the order regarding the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Anwendbarkeit von § 246 Abs. 9 BauGB auf private Vorhabenträger

[GRUENDE]

Auf die Beschwerde der Klägerin wird die Revision nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zugelassen. In dem Revisionsverfahren wird voraussichtlich geklärt werden, ob und unter welchen Voraussetzungen Vorhaben, die der Unterbringung von Asylbegehrenden und Flüchtlingen dienen, von § 246 Abs. 9 BauGB begünstigt werden, wenn ein privater Vorhabenträger ein solches Vorhaben verwirklichen möchte.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.