Legislator Case Law & Legislation
7 B 8/16, 7 B 8/16 (7 C 15/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:110517B7B8.16.0 AI generated

Statutory basis for assessing the annual turnover of a waste management collection company

Case Number 7 B 8/16, 7 B 8/16 (7 C 15/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, finding the plaintiff's complaint admissible and thereby allowing the case to proceed to the Federal Administrative Court for a final judgment on the merits. The dispute concerned the legal obligation of a collection company to disclose its annual turnover when applying for a license under waste management regulations, challenging the lower court's denial of leave to appeal. The decisive legal basis for this decision is Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Procedure (VwGO), which permits appeal where the matter has fundamental significance, specifically to clarify whether Section 18(2) No. 1 of the Waste Management Act (KrWG) mandates the provision of annual turnover data by the applicant.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 3 GKG; Statutory basis for assessing the annual turnover of a waste management collection company: The dispute concerned the legal obligation of a collection company to disclose its annual turnover when applying for a license under waste management regulations, challenging the lower court's denial of leave to appeal. The decisive legal basis for this decision is Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Procedure (VwGO), which permits appeal where the matter has fundamental significance, specifically to clarify whether Section 18(2) No. 1 of the Waste Management Act (KrWG) mandates the provision of annual turnover data by the applicant.

Keywords

AI generated
turnover statutory basis waste management value in dispute annual leave administrative complaint

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for determining the value in dispute for both the complaint and revision proceedings.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for determining the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for determining the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 3 GKG
Supplementary basis for determining the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for determining the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 3 GKG

Supplementary basis for determining the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for determining the value in dispute for both the complaint and revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for determining the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Angaben zum Jahresumsatz eines Sammlungsunternehmens

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich jedenfalls zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob nach § 18 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 KrWG auch Angaben zum Jahresumsatz des Sammlungsunternehmens gefordert werden können.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 sowie § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.