Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
1 B 23/17, 1 B 23/17 (1 C 6/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:270317B1B23.17.0 AI generated

Revision leave for standard of proof on feasibility of expulsion under asylum law

Case Number 1 B 23/17, 1 B 23/17 (1 C 6/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to file a revision appeal, finding that the case raised a question of fundamental legal significance under § 132(2)(1) VwGO, thereby allowing the appellant to proceed against the prior decision. The dispute concerns the interpretation of the requirements for establishing that an expulsion is "capable of being carried out" under § 34a(1) Sentence 1 of the Asylum Act (AsylG) and the legal consequences if this threshold is not met. The court specifically authorized the further clarification of the prerequisites for this determination and the ensuing legal effects, identifying these undefined standards as the decisive legal issue requiring review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 34a Abs. 1 Satz 1 AsylG; Revision leave for standard of proof on feasibility of expulsion under asylum law: The dispute concerns the interpretation of the requirements for establishing that an expulsion is "capable of being carried out" under § 34a(1) Sentence 1 of the Asylum Act (AsylG) and the legal consequences if this threshold is not met. The court specifically authorized the further clarification of the prerequisites for this determination and the ensuing legal effects, identifying these undefined standards as the decisive legal issue requiring review.

Keywords

AI generated
revision of asylum decision standard of proof unreasonableness of expulsion removal under immigration law interpretation of the law asylum jurisdictional competence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited as the legal basis for granting leave to appeal the revision due to the question of fundamental legal significance.
§ 34a Abs. 1 Satz 1 AsylG
1 VwGO) zuzulassen, weil sie dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Fragen geben kann, unter welchen Voraussetzungen im Sinne des § 34a Abs. 1 Satz 1 AsylG "feststeht", dass eine Abschiebung durchgeführt werden kann, und welche Rechtsfolgen sich ergeben, wenn dies nicht der Fall ist
AI generated
1 B 59/17
Admissibility of revision appeal in asylum cases: Divergence and fundamental significance requirements for factual assessments of persecution risk
10 B 4/10, 10 B 4/10 (10 C 25/10)
Revocation of refugee status: Standard of proof for the risk of renewed persecution
1 B 4/13
Befristung der Sperrwirkung einer Ausweisung: Voraussetzungen der Abweichung vom Ausreise-Erfordernis bei Asylberechtigten
1 B 108/17, 1 PKH 62/17, 1 B 108/17, 1 PKH 62/17
Asylum: Admissibility of revision based on factual discrepancies between regional courts regarding threat of persecution for military service evasion
1 B 58/16, 1 B 58/16 (1 C 18/16)
Admissibility of Revision: Interpreting Interplay Between §§ 26a and 27a AsylG

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the legal basis for granting leave to appeal the revision due to the question of fundamental legal significance.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Voraussetzung für das Feststehen der Abschiebungsdurchführbarkeit

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen, weil sie dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Fragen geben kann, unter welchen Voraussetzungen im Sinne des § 34a Abs. 1 Satz 1 AsylG "feststeht", dass eine Abschiebung durchgeführt werden kann, und welche Rechtsfolgen sich ergeben, wenn dies nicht der Fall ist