Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 B 35/16, 4 B 35/16 (4 C 8/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:141116B4B35.16.0 AI generated

Validity of a residential zoning plan excluding core uses under § 4(2) BauNVO while permitting general exceptions

Case Number 4 B 35/16, 4 B 35/16 (4 C 8/16)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, finding the complaint well-founded and allowing the case to proceed to a full revision hearing. The dispute concerns the validity of a detailed development plan that excluded all residential uses permitted under § 4(2) nos. 2 and 3 of the Building Code (BauNVO) while generally permitting exceptions under § 4(3). The court identified a fundamental legal question of general significance regarding whether such a plan violates the general purpose of a general residential area under § 4 BauNVO by excluding core residential functions, thereby necessitating clarification in the upcoming revision proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Validity of a residential zoning plan excluding core uses under § 4(2) BauNVO while permitting general exceptions: The dispute concerns the validity of a detailed development plan that excluded all residential uses permitted under § 4(2) nos. 2 and 3 of the Building Code (BauNVO) while generally permitting exceptions under § 4(3). The court identified a fundamental legal question of general significance regarding whether such a plan violates the general purpose of a general residential area under § 4 BauNVO by excluding core residential functions, thereby necessitating clarification in the upcoming revision proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
zoning violation building plan excluded cases validity requirement administrative complaint zone subject to mandatory planning

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal (Revisionszulassung) due to fundamental legal significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwertfestsetzung) for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
4 BN 10/21
Validity of excluding residential use in a mixed zone while permitting operational apartments as a counter-exception under BauNVO
4 C 8/16
Invalidity of zoning plan excluding all generally permitted uses from general residential area despite uplisting hospitality businesses
4 BN 11/21
Zoning Plan Validity: Combining Exclusion of Residential Use with Business Apartment Counter-Exception in Mixed-Use Area
4 CN 3/14
Validity of mixed zoning in a weekend-house area: compatibility of secured residential use with area character under § 10 BauNVO
4 BN 7/24, 4 BN 7/24 (4 CN 2/24)
Admissibility of zoning plan provisions limiting ground surface area requirements exclusively to main structures under § 16 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 BauNVO

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal (Revisionszulassung) due to fundamental legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwertfestsetzung) for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Gültigkeit eines Bebauungsplans bei Ausschluss von Nutzungen nach § 4 BauNVO

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der grundsätzlich bedeutsamen Rechtsfrage beitragen, ob ein Bebauungsplan die allgemeine Zweckbestimmung eines allgemeinen Wohngebiets nach § 4 BauNVO wahrt, wenn in ihm alle zulässigen Nutzungen nach § 4 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 und 3 BauNVO ausgeschlossen, ausnahmsweise nach § 4 Abs. 3 BauNVO zulässige Nutzungen aber allgemein zugelassen werden.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.