Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2 B 111/15, 2 B 111/15 (2 C 27/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:200916B2B111.15.0 AI generated

Compensation of foreign standby duty via leisure time: fundamental significance of valuation rules for Revisionszulassung under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO

Case Number 2 B 111/15, 2 B 111/15 (2 C 27/16)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of the plaintiff’s appeal, ruling in his favor on the procedural question of legal significance. The dispute concerned the valuation of additional work performed in the form of standby duty, specifically regarding its compensation through leisure time for duties performed abroad. The court determined that the case presented fundamental legal questions regarding the compensation of such standby work, particularly in the context of international service, thereby satisfying the requirements for appellate jurisdiction under § 132 (2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Rules.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG; Compensation of foreign standby duty via leisure time: fundamental significance of valuation rules for Revisionszulassung under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO: The dispute concerned the valuation of additional work performed in the form of standby duty, specifically regarding its compensation through leisure time for duties performed abroad. The court determined that the case presented fundamental legal questions regarding the compensation of such standby work, particularly in the context of international service, thereby satisfying the requirements for appellate jurisdiction under § 132 (2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Rules.

Keywords

AI generated
legal working time compensation rules procedural duty unpaid leave foreign law customs valuation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG
Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
AI generated
2 B 113/15, 2 B 113/15 (2 C 28/16)
Compensation of on-call duty excess work via leisure time: legal treatment of service performed abroad
2 B 112/15, 2 B 112/15 (2 C 23/15)
Compensatory leisure time for overseas on-call duty: Admissibility of revision due to fundamental legal significance
2 B 114/15, 2 B 114/15 (2 C 26/16)
Compensation of foreign on-call service as overwork offset by leisure time in public service
2 C 21/15
Full one-to-one leisure time compensation for ordered police standby duty under § 88 Satz 2 BBG
2 C 22/15
Compensatory leave ratio for standby duty under German civil service law and EU Working Time Directive

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG

Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; durch Freizeit auszugleichende Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst insbesondere bei einer Dienstleistung im Ausland

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Klägers ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung von Fragen geben, die sich im Zusammenhang mit durch Freizeit auszugleichender Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst stellen. Dies betrifft insbesondere die bei einer Dienstleistung im Ausland erbrachte Mehrarbeit. Zu diesen Fragen sind beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht weitere Revisionen anhängig (Verfahren BVerwG 2 C 21.15 bis 2 C 24.15, 2 C 28.15 und 2 C 3.16).

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG und entspricht der Streitwertfestsetzung des Berufungsgerichts.