Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
5 B 6/16, 5 B 6/16 (5 C 17/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:060916B5B6.16.0 AI generated

Compatibility of Lower Saxony Supplementary Allowances Regulation § 17(7) with superior law

Case Number 5 B 6/16, 5 B 6/16 (5 C 17/16)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted the plaintiff's revision and permitted the appeal, ruling that the legal issue possessed fundamental significance. The dispute concerned a challenge to the compatibility of § 17(7) sentence 1 of the Lower Saxony Supplementary Allowances Regulation (NBhVO) of November 7, 2011, with superior law. The decisive legal basis for the decision is § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, which governs the admission of revision on grounds of fundamental legal significance, enabling the appellate court to examine whether the contested regulation on medical supplementary allowances aligns with higher-ranking legal norms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Compatibility of Lower Saxony Supplementary Allowances Regulation § 17(7) with superior law: The dispute concerned a challenge to the compatibility of § 17(7) sentence 1 of the Lower Saxony Supplementary Allowances Regulation (NBhVO) of November 7, 2011, with superior law. The decisive legal basis for the decision is § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, which governs the admission of revision on grounds of fundamental legal significance, enabling the appellate court to examine whether the contested regulation on medical supplementary allowances aligns with higher-ranking legal norms.

Keywords

AI generated
supplementary sentence grounds for revision challenge of administrative decisions approximation of laws matters covered by the regulations special provisions for Luxembourg

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
AI generated
5 B 66/12
Validity of administrative application under the Compensation Law and scope of analogical application to the Investment Priority Act
2 B 94/09
Legality requirement for statutory delegation of official assistance cost-deduction flat rates and prohibition of retroactive annualization
IV ZR 85/20
Validity of Sanierungsgelder for capital-funded supplementary pension funds and scope of judicial review under § 315 BGB
9 B 71/11
Sufficiency of appeal justification referencing prior provisional orders and exclusion of objective legal arbitrariness from procedural error
4 C 23/13
Sanierungsrechtliche Ausgleichsbeträge: Anknüpfung der Festsetzungsfrist an formellen Abschluss statt Treu und Glauben

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Klärung der Frage, ob § 17 Abs. 7 Satz 1 der Niedersächsischen Beihilfeverordnung mit höherrangigem Recht in Einklang steht

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob die Bestimmung des § 17 Abs. 7 Satz 1 der Niedersächsischen Beihilfeverordnung (NBhVO) vom 7. November 2011 (Nds. GVBl. S. 372) mit höherrangigem Recht in Einklang steht.