Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 BN 27/14, 4 BN 27/14 (4 CN 1/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:280116B4BN27.14.0 AI generated

Obligation to re-expose land-use plan draft and re-consult stakeholders when environmental report is amended post-participation

Case Number 4 BN 27/14, 4 BN 27/14 (4 CN 1/16)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, reversing the lower court's implicit refusal and directing that the case proceed to revision due to its fundamental significance. The dispute concerned municipal planning law, specifically whether a municipality is legally obligated to re-expose the draft of a detailed land-use plan for public and authority consultation under the Building Code if the accompanying environmental report is modified after the initial participation phases have concluded. The decisive legal basis involves §§ 132(1), 133(1), and 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO), combined with §§ 4a(3) sentence 1 and 3(2) of the Building Code (BauGB), establishing the procedural requirements for revisiting planning documents when environmental assessments are amended.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 4a Abs. 3 Satz 1 BauGB, § 3 Abs. 2 BauGB, § 4 Abs. 2 BauGB, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Obligation to re-expose land-use plan draft and re-consult stakeholders when environmental report is amended post-participation: The dispute concerned municipal planning law, specifically whether a municipality is legally obligated to re-expose the draft of a detailed land-use plan for public and authority consultation under the Building Code if the accompanying environmental report is modified after the initial participation phases have concluded. The decisive legal basis involves §§ 132(1), 133(1), and 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO), combined with §§ 4a(3) sentence 1 and 3(2) of the Building Code (BauGB), establishing the procedural requirements for revisiting planning documents when environmental assessments are amended.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds for revision land law revision of zoning plan municipal land obligation to build procedural requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO
1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 4a Abs. 3 Satz 1 BauGB
§ 3 Abs. 2 BauGB
3 Satz 1 BauGB erneut auszulegen und die Stellungnahmen erneut einzuholen, wenn der dem Entwurf des Bebauungsplans beigefügte Umweltbericht nach der Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung gemäß § 3 Abs. 2 BauGB und der Behördenbeteiligung gemäß § 4 Abs.
§ 4 Abs. 2 BauGB
2 BauGB und der Behördenbeteiligung gemäß § 4 Abs. 2 BauGB geändert wird.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO
Procedural basis establishing the admissibility of the complaint against the refusal of leave to appeal.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis cited for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
4 BN 25/19
Obligation to Repeat Public Participation in Urban Planning After Amendment of Draft Development Plan
4 BN 46/21
Substantive effect of textual amendments to draft land-use plans: Mandatory re-consultation under § 4a Abs. 3 BauGB depends on regulatory content, not timing or pending litigation
4 B 41/15
Validity of regional land-use plan change challenged on failure to disclose environmental information in public notice
4 CN 1/16
Validity of zoning plan where environmental report amended after public participation: no obligation for re-exhibition under BauGB § 4a(3) or EU SEA Directive
4 BN 42/09
Reopening public participation when supplementary procedure substantively alters land-use plan with adverse effects

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

§ 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO

Procedural basis establishing the admissibility of the complaint against the refusal of leave to appeal.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis cited for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; erneute Auslegung des Bebauungsplans nach Änderung des Umweltberichts

[GRUENDE]

Die gemäß § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur weiteren Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen Voraussetzungen eine Gemeinde verpflichtet ist, den Entwurf eines Bebauungsplans gemäß § 4a Abs. 3 Satz 1 BauGB erneut auszulegen und die Stellungnahmen erneut einzuholen, wenn der dem Entwurf des Bebauungsplans beigefügte Umweltbericht nach der Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung gemäß § 3 Abs. 2 BauGB und der Behördenbeteiligung gemäß § 4 Abs. 2 BauGB geändert wird.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.