Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9 B 24/15, 9 B 24/15 (9 C 21/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:030915B9B24.15.0 AI generated

Consequences of phased construction of development facilities and provisional measures on contribution levies

Case Number 9 B 24/15, 9 B 24/15 (9 C 21/15)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) dismissed the defendant's objection, upholding the lower court's decision to allow the appeal on points of law (Revision) and provisionally setting the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings. The dispute concerned public construction law, specifically the levying of development contribution fees (Erschließungsbeiträge) in a case involving the phased creation of a development facility accompanied by the execution of provisional measures. The court granted the appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, determining that the matter has fundamental significance because it requires the appellate senate to clarify the legal consequences of incrementally constructing development infrastructure and implementing interim solutions. The provisional determination of the litigation value was based on § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, and § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; Consequences of phased construction of development facilities and provisional measures on contribution levies: The dispute concerned public construction law, specifically the levying of development contribution fees (Erschließungsbeiträge) in a case involving the phased creation of a development facility accompanied by the execution of provisional measures. The court granted the appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, determining that the matter has fundamental significance because it requires the appellate senate to clarify the legal consequences of incrementally constructing development infrastructure and implementing interim solutions. The provisional determination of the litigation value was based on § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, and § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Keywords

AI generated
construction contribution public levies dispute provisional measures revision proceedings legal fees development charges

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the provisional calculation of the amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the appeal proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the provisional calculation of the amount in dispute.
AI generated
9 B 26/15, 9 B 26/15 (9 C 23/15)
Infrastructure contribution consequences of step-by-step facility construction and provisional measures
9 B 23/15, 9 B 23/15 (9 C 20/15)
Contribution liability for staged infrastructure completion and provisional measures
9 B 27/15, 9 B 27/15 (9 C 24/15)
Subdivision charges triggered by step-by-step construction of access facilities and provisional measures
9 B 25/15, 9 B 25/15 (9 C 22/15)
Infrastructure charges arising from step-by-step construction of public facilities and provisional measures
9 C 5/21
Erschließungsbeitrag: Exclusion of levy based on statutory time limit measured from the entry of the advantageous situation

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the appeal proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the provisional calculation of the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the provisional calculation of the amount in dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; schrittweise Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage; provisorische Maßnahmen

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der erschließungsbeitragsrechtlichen Folgen einer schrittweisen Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage einschließlich der damit einhergehenden Durchführung provisorischer Maßnahmen geben.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.