Constitutional complaint on waiving independent justification in parallel decisions under § 93d BVerfGG
Germany (DE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint, rendering the decision final and unappealable. The case involved a challenge to a constitutional matter where the petitioner claimed applicability of a parallel decision. The Court based its ruling on the doctrine of parallel decisions (Parallelentscheidungen), referencing the reasons provided in a concurrent order from the same Chamber issued on December 8, 2011. Under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, the Court waived providing an independent substantive justification, relying instead on the cited precedent to resolve the dispute.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint on waiving independent justification in parallel decisions under § 93d BVerfGG: The case involved a challenge to a constitutional matter where the petitioner claimed applicability of a parallel decision. The Court based its ruling on the doctrine of parallel decisions (Parallelentscheidungen), referencing the reasons provided in a concurrent order from the same Chamber issued on December 8, 2011. Under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, the Court waived providing an independent substantive justification, relying instead on the cited precedent to resolve the dispute.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedProcedural rule permitting the court to waive a further independent legal justification by referencing a parallel decision.
Full text
Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung
[GRUENDE]
Zur Begründung wird auf die im vorliegenden Verfahren ebenfalls Geltung beanspruchenden Ausführungen im Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 8. Dezember 2011 im Verfahren 1 BvR 1932/08 (www.bverfg.de) verwiesen.
Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.