Legislator Case Law & Legislation
1 BvR 367/12 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rs20120504.1bvr036712 AI generated

Interim suspension of call-by-call price announcement mandate due to missing transitional period

Case Number 1 BvR 367/12
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Constitutional Court granted the requested interim relief, ordering that the statutory provision mandating price announcements for call-by-call telephone calls not enter into force prior to August 1, 2012, while denying all other aspects of the application; the applicants prevailed in securing a moratorium on the disputed regulation. The dispute arose from a challenge to a federal telecommunications amendment adopted by the Bundestag in February 2012, which introduced immediate pricing obligations for specific telephone services without providing a transitional period for compliance. Relying on Section 32, Paragraph 5, Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, the court issued this preliminary ruling to prevent imminent legal effects, deferring the entry into force of the specific norm to allow for a reasonable transition period, with the full grounds to be communicated separately to the parties.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG, § 32 Abs. 5 S. 2 BVerfGG; Interim suspension of call-by-call price announcement mandate due to missing transitional period: The dispute arose from a challenge to a federal telecommunications amendment adopted by the Bundestag in February 2012, which introduced immediate pricing obligations for specific telephone services without providing a transitional period for compliance. Relying on Section 32, Paragraph 5, Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, the court issued this preliminary ruling to prevent imminent legal effects, deferring the entry into force of the specific norm to allow for a reasonable transition period, with the full grounds to be communicated separately to the parties.

Keywords

AI generated
telecommunications services interim relief transitional provisions suspension period effects of a preliminary ruling entry into force

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 32 Abs. 5 S. 2 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for separating the written reasoning from the immediate operative order regarding the interim injunction.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung: Aufschub des Inkrafttretens der Reglungen über die Einführung einer Preisansagepflicht für Call-by-Call-Telefonate - Fehlen einer Übergangsfrist - hier: Vorabentscheidung gem § 32 Abs 5 S 2 BVerfGG

[TENOR]

Artikel 1 Nummer 62 Buchstabe a) aa) des vom Deutschen Bundestag am 9. Februar 2012 beschlossenen und vom Bundespräsidenten am 3. Mai 2012 ausgefertigten Gesetzes zur Änderung telekommunikationsrechtlicher Regelungen tritt nicht vor dem 1. August 2012 in Kraft.

Im Übrigen wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung abgelehnt.

...

Die Begründung wird den Beteiligten gesondert übermittelt (§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG).