Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VPB 762-2002-0242 AI generated

Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Lack of Power of Attorney

Case Number VPB 762-2002-0242
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Administrative Practice of Federal Authorities (VPB) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Court of Insurance declared a legal challenge inadmissible because the appellant failed to provide a written power of attorney from the person they represented. The court cited articles concerning communication and representation in legal proceedings, emphasizing the necessity of formal authorization for an individual to act on behalf of another in a legal matter.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 11, al. 2 et 3, PCF en relation avec les art. 40 et 135 OJ; Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Lack of Power of Attorney: The court cited articles concerning communication and representation in legal proceedings, emphasizing the necessity of formal authorization for an individual to act on behalf of another in a legal matter.

Keywords

AI generated
power of attorney legal representation limited legal capacity authorization to sue disqualification of attorney standing to appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 11, al. 2 et 3, PCF en relation avec les art. 40 et 135 OJ
These provisions govern the communication of the decision and the overall procedural framework for administrative appeals.
AI generated
VPB 04-0266-829
Federal Court of Insurance Dismisses Appeal for Lack of Justification
VPB 2004.266
Federal Court of Insurance Dismisses Appeal for Lack of Justification
VPB 2008.31
Federal Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Lack of Legal Interest
VPB 2002.1151
Federal Insurance Court Dismisses Appeal as Inadmissible
VPB 830-2004-0284
Federal Court of Insurance: Administrative Appeal Inadmissible, No Costs Awarded

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 11, al. 2 et 3, PCF en relation avec les art. 40 et 135 OJ

These provisions govern the communication of the decision and the overall procedural framework for administrative appeals.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Communication (art. 11, al. 2 et 3, PCF en relation avec les art. 40 et 135 OJ)

A Nicole Germanier, route du Châble, Malchamps, F - 74160 Feigères Statuant sur le recours de droit administratif de Nicole Germanier, 1146, route du Châble, Malchamps, FR-74160 Feigères/France du 3 août 2001, le Tribunal fédéral des assurances, par arrêt du 6 décembre 2001, a prononcé:

I. Le recours est irrecevable.

II. Il n’est pas perçu de frais de justice. Un exemplaire de l’arrêt, ainsi que les annexes, sont à la disposition de Nicole Germanier auprès de la chancellerie du Tribunal fédéral des assurances.

5 février 2002 Tribunal fédéral des assurances:

p.o. du Président le Directeur de la chancellerie

H 251/01 Tn

762 2002-0242 Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

Communication Nicole Germanier

In Bundesblatt Dans Feuille fédérale In Foglio federale

Jahr 2002 Année Anno

Band 1 Volume Volume

Heft 05 Cahier Numero

Geschäftsnummer --- Numéro d'affaire Numero dell'oggetto

Datum 05.02.2002 Date Data

Seite 762-762 Page Pagina

Ref. No 10 125 998

Die elektronischen Daten der Schweizerischen Bundeskanzlei wurden durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv übernommen.

Les données électroniques de la Chancellerie fédérale suisse ont été reprises par les Archives fédérales suisses.

I dati elettronici della Cancelleria federale svizzera sono stati ripresi dall'Archivio federale svizzero.