Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 08 84 • KG LU 11 08 84 AI generated

Gastronomy Overtime Dispute: Employee Records Upheld Against Employer's Late Counter-Evidence

Case Number 11 08 84
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court addressed a dispute over compensation for overtime hours claimed by an employee in the gastronomy sector, where the employer challenged the overtime calculation based on the employee's submitted time records, arguing against being denied the opportunity to present counter-evidence. The court reasoned that under the applicable collective agreement, the employee's time records serve as admissible evidence when the employer fails to keep proper work-time documentation, and since the employee regularly submitted these monthly records, the employer was deemed to have knowledge of and implicitly accept them by not objecting. Consequently, the employer's subsequent attempt to disprove the recorded hours via witness testimony was deemed irrelevant because the employer had effectively acknowledged the records' accuracy by failing to raise timely objections, as a pattern of accepting the regular submissions implies acceptance of their correctness.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 321c OR; Art. 21 Abs. 3 L-GAV. Beweislast und Entschädigung für Überstundenarbeit. Arbeitszeitkontrolle des Mitarbeiters als Beweismittel. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Keywords

AI generated
recording of working time compensation for overtime collective agreement witness testimony acceptance of the work irrelevant evidence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 321c OR
Leitsatz: · Art. 321c OR; Art.
Art. 21 Abs. 3 L-GAV
321c OR; Art. 21 Abs. 3 L-GAV.
Art. 15 Abs. 4 L-GAV

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 17.11.2008

Fallnummer: · 11 08 84

LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 14

Leitsatz: · Art. 321c OR; Art. 21 Abs. 3 L-GAV. Beweislast und Entschädigung für Überstundenarbeit. Arbeitszeitkontrolle des Mitarbeiters als Beweismittel.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.