Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 03 96 • KG LU 11 03 96 AI generated

Lease Agreement Interpretation: Fixed Term vs. Indefinite Contract

Case Number 11 03 96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The dispute centered on whether a lease agreement, which specified a "fixed term" until a certain date followed by automatic annual renewals unless terminated six months in advance, constituted a fixed-term or an indefinite contract. The court reasoned that the explicit requirement for notice of termination after the initial date, despite the mention of a "fixed duration," clearly indicated an intention for the contract to continue indefinitely unless actively ended, classifying it as an indefinite lease with a minimum term, not a true fixed-term contract, thus requiring adherence to statutory procedures for lease extensions if terminated.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 18, 273 Abs. 2 lit. a und 300 OR. Auslegung eines Pachtvertrages bezüglich der Frage, ob ein befristetes oder ein unbefristetes Vertragsverhältnis vorliegt. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Keywords

AI generated
contract of indefinite duration lease agreement termination date statutory requirement contract interpretation validity of lease termination

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BGE 114 II 166
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 273 Abs. 2 lit. a OR

Cited in the reasoning that explains why the request for extension was rejected due to being filed too late, implying this article sets the procedural deadline.

Art. 300 OR

Cited in the reasoning regarding the procedure for the extension of an indefinite lease, justifying the application of procedural rules concerning extension requests.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 15.09.2003

Fallnummer: · 11 03 96

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 17

Leitsatz: · Art. 18, 273 Abs. 2 lit. a und 300 OR. Auslegung eines Pachtvertrages bezüglich der Frage, ob ein befristetes oder ein unbefristetes Vertragsverhältnis vorliegt.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.