Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 03 69 • KG LU 11 03 69 AI generated

Summary Procedure vs. Enforcement Under Lugano Convention Regarding Choice of Forum Clauses

Case Number 11 03 69
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Court Costs Borne by public authority

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court addressed whether the summary procedure under local civil procedure code is considered an enforcement proceeding under Article 16(5) of the Lugano Convention, which would invalidate a contractual choice of forum clause. The court reasoned that the summary procedure serves to quickly establish a title for a claim (a title-production proceeding) rather than enforce an existing judgment, as required by the literal wording and the purpose of Article 16(5) of the Lugano Convention, which mandates restrictive interpretation for exclusive jurisdiction provisions. Consequently, since no mandatory jurisdiction under Article 16(5) applied, the parties' contractual agreement designating a specific forum was to be upheld, leading to the reversal of the lower court's decision that dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ. Das Befehlsverfahren gemäss § 226 ZPO ist kein Zwangsvollstreckungsverfahren im Sinne von Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ. Da somit kein zwingender Gerichtsstand im Sinne dieser Bestimmung gegeben ist, sind allfällige Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen zu beachten. | Zivilprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
lugano Convention Civil Procedure Code lack of jurisdiction enforcement decision choice of procedure interpretation of a judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 16 Ziff. 5 Lug
Leitsatz: · Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ.
Art. 292 StGB
Art. 17 Lug
Art. 17 Abs. 3 Lug
Art. 16 Lug
Leitsatz: · Art. 16 Ziff.
Art. 20 GestG
Art. 16 EuGV
Leitsatz: · Art. 16 Ziff.
Art. 17 Abs. 1 Lug

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BGE 103 II 251
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ

The court implicitly ruled that this provision does not establish mandatory jurisdiction for the payment order procedure, allowing the contractual forum clause to stand.

Art. 17 Abs. 1 LugÜ

The court confirmed that the conditions for the validity of the forum selection clause under this article were met.

Art. 17 Abs. 3 LugÜ

The court confirmed that this provision excluding forum selection clauses in cases of mandatory jurisdiction under Art. 16 LugÜ did not apply, because Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ was inapplicable.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive concerning the allocation of court costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 28.07.2003

Fallnummer: · 11 03 69

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 27

Leitsatz: · Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ. Das Befehlsverfahren gemäss § 226 ZPO ist kein Zwangsvollstreckungsverfahren im Sinne von Art. 16 Ziff. 5 LugÜ. Da somit kein zwingender Gerichtsstand im Sinne dieser Bestimmung gegeben ist, sind allfällige Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen zu beachten.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.