Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
11 02 111 • KG LU 11 02 111 AI generated

Unjustified Termination, Wage Claims, and Penalty Payment in Employee Dismissal with Post-Mortem Assignment of Claim

Case Number 11 02 111
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court confirmed the lower court's decision regarding unjustified termination and resulting wage claims following an employee's dismissal after a workplace dispute, where the employee was later found to have been suffering from depression, but ultimately overturned the award of a penalty payment under Art. 337c Abs. 3 OR due to exceptional circumstances, specifically considering the employer's non-culpable conduct regarding the unknown illness and post-termination consideration shown to the former employee, while also ruling that the cost-free nature of labor disputes applies even when a creditor acquires the claim through an assignment following the liquidation of the deceased employee's estate.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 337c Abs. 1 und 3, 341 Abs. 1, 343 Abs. 2 und 3 und 362 OR; Art. 260 SchKG; § 67 AGG. Innerhalb eines Monats seit Beendigung des Arbeitsverhältnisses ist ein Verzicht auf eine Strafzahlung nach Art. 337c Abs. 3 OR nicht möglich. Keine Strafzahlung für ungerechtfertigte fristlose Entlassung bei Vorliegen besonderer Umstände. Die Kostenlosigkeit arbeitsrechtlicher Streitigkeiten gilt auch für den Abtretungsgläubiger nach Art. 260 SchKG. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Keywords

AI generated
liquidation of estate assignment of wages unjustified termination of employment labor disputes deceased compensation for loss of earnings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 260 SchKG
The court determined that the cost-free nature of labor disputes applies even to an assignee creditor under this article who entered the appeal proceedings.
Art. 337c Abs. 3 OR
The court decided to refrain from imposing the penalty payment on the employer based on the specific circumstances of the case.
Art. 341 Abs. 1 OR
The court referenced this article regarding the inadmissibility of waiving claims within one month of employment termination.
Art. 115 OR
Art. 341 OR
Art. 362 OR
Art. 361 OR
Art. 337c OR
Leitsatz: · Art. 337c Abs.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BGE 116 II 301
BGE 122 III 189
BGE 105 III 135
Assignment Creditor's Right vs. Obligation to Take Over Pending Litigation and Cost Liability
AI generated
V 05 237 1
Damages for Illegal Ordinary Termination of Public-Law Employment Versus Penalty and Jurisdiction over Related Claims
V 05 237 2
Damages for Unlawful Ordinary Termination of Public-Law Employment and Scope of Compensation
11 04 15
Heirs' Liability for Contractual Penalty Under Collective Bargaining Agreement Upon Death
V 03 347 2
Severance Payment Entitlement and Administrative Appeal Route
11 95 102 231
Abusive Termination and Coercive Wage Reduction Settlement

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 337c Abs. 3 OR

The court decided to refrain from imposing the penalty payment on the employer based on the specific circumstances of the case.

Art. 341 Abs. 1 OR

The court referenced this article regarding the inadmissibility of waiving claims within one month of employment termination.

Art. 260 SchKG

The court determined that the cost-free nature of labor disputes applies even to an assignee creditor under this article who entered the appeal proceedings.

§ 67 AGG

The court confirmed that labor law dispute proceedings remain free of charge, without awarding party compensation, in the appeal stage, citing this provision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 28.12.2004

Fallnummer: · 11 02 111

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 22

Leitsatz: · Art. 337c Abs. 1 und 3, 341 Abs. 1, 343 Abs. 2 und 3 und 362 OR; Art. 260 SchKG; § 67 AGG. Innerhalb eines Monats seit Beendigung des Arbeitsverhältnisses ist ein Verzicht auf eine Strafzahlung nach Art. 337c Abs. 3 OR nicht möglich. Keine Strafzahlung für ungerechtfertigte fristlose Entlassung bei Vorliegen besonderer Umstände. Die Kostenlosigkeit arbeitsrechtlicher Streitigkeiten gilt auch für den Abtretungsgläubiger nach Art. 260 SchKG.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.