175.252
GEBVVGROEMTAOTTA
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 3 : Gebührenverordnung des Verwaltungsgerichts (GebV VGr)
Art. 3
1 Bei Verfahren mit bestimmbarem Streitwert richtet sich Grundgebühr
die Gerichtsgebühr nach dem Streitwert und beträgt in der Regel
Streitwert
Gerichtsgebühr
(in Franken)
(in Franken)
bis 5 000
500
von
5000 bis 10 000
500 bis 1100
von
10 000
bis 20 000
1 100 bis 2 200
von
20 000 bis 50 000
2 200 bis 4 400
von
50 000 bis 100 000
4 400 bis 6600
von
100 000 bis 250 000
6 600 bis 11 000
von
250 000 bis 500 000
11 000 bis 16 500
von
500 000 bis 1 Mio.
16 500 bis 22 000
über 1 Mio.
22 000 bis 50 000
1.7.19 - 105
1
175.252
Gebührenverordnung des Verwaltungsgerichts – GebV VGr
Erhöhung und
Herabsetzung
2 Bei Verfahren ohne bestimmbaren Streitwert beläuft sich die Ge-
bühr in der Regel auf Fr. 500 bis Fr. 50 000.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (130)
VB.2011.00624 · zh (§ 3 Abs. III GebV VGr)
Retail Warehouse Demolition Permit and Parking Fee Dispute
This provision concerns the litigation cost set by the lower court, which the court found excessive for the appellant.
BRGE.IV.Nrn.0156.01 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
Landfill Expansion Annulled Over Unlawful Environmental Assessment and Procedural Flaws
Used to determine the court fees for the proceedings.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0134.202 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
Rezoning for Sports Facility Overturned Due to Scope and Location Violations
Cited as the basis for the range of court fees in cases without a determinable dispute value.
BRGE.III.Nr.0076.20 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
Municipality's Right of First Refusal on Composite Property Transfer Upheld
Cited to set the standard range for court fees in cases without a determinable value, applied to the fee calculation.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0024.202 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
Neighbors v. Municipality Regarding Homeless Shelter Expansion Near Historic Schoolhouse
Cited in conjunction with § 338 Abs. 2 PBG regarding the range for the court fee.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0008.202 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
Appeal Dismissed as Moot Due to Preceding Building Freeze
Cited for the general range of court fees in cases without a determinable dispute value.
BRGE.I.Nr.0237.2024 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
Neighbor Appeal Against Municipal Building Permits and Special Building Regulations Upheld in Part
This provision was cited in relation to the standard range for the court fee in cases without a determined value in dispute.
BRGE.III.Nr.0190.20 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
Municipality v. Cantonal Building Directorate: Public Duty vs. Public Interest in Development Planning
The court cited this provision regarding the range for setting the court fee when the dispute value is not determinable.
BRGE.IV.Nrn.0195.01 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
Observation Platform Permit Upheld Despite Forest Zone Concerns
Sets the range for court fees in cases without a determinable dispute value.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0182.202 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
Mobile Phone Antenna Installation Permit Granted After Redesign
This provision was used in conjunction with § 338 Abs. 1 PBG to establish the range for court fees in cases without a determinable value of dispute.
BRGE.I.Nr.0197.2024 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
Riverfront Flood Protection and Revitalization Area Dispute
Cited as the basis for determining the range of court fees in cases without a determinable dispute value.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0159.202 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
Appeal Against Refusal to Rebuild Destroyed Weekend House in Forest Area Allowed
Cited to confirm the applicable range for setting the court fee when no definite value in dispute exists.
BRGE.I.Nrn.0091.009 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
M-Hall Building Permit Revoked Pending Historical Assessment
Cited for the typical range of court fees in cases without a quantifiable dispute value.
BRGE.I.Nr.0083.2024 · zh (§ 3 Abs. 2 GebV VGr)
Appeal Against Seeufer Wollishofen Planning Zone Upheld Due to Lack of Changed Circumstances
Cited in connection with the general fee range for cases without a determinable value in dispute.
SR.2023.00028 · zh (§ 3 Abs. I GebV VGr neu)
Tax Security Measure Against Non-Bankrupt Spouse for Joint Tax Liability Upheld
This provision was used to determine the appropriate amount for the court fee, which was set based on the court's expenditure.