175.2
VRGLPALGA
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 60 : Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)
Art. 60
Die zur Abklärung des Sachverhaltes erforderlichen Be- e. Beweis-
weise werden von Amtes wegen erhoben. Die Durchführung des Be- erhebungen
weisverfahrens kann ganz oder teilweise einer Abordnung oder einem
Mitglied des Gerichtes übertragen werden. Die Bestimmungen der
Zivilprozessordnung27 über das Beweisverfahren sind sinngemäss an-
zuwenden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (37)
VB.2011.00730 · zh (Art. 60 VRG)
Co-Owner's Appeal of Solely Named Party's Building Decision Over Public Footpath Access
Cited in the list of referenced norms, likely procedural, but not explicitly mentioned in the operative section.
VB.2000.00312 · zh (§ 60 VRG)
Appeal Regarding Preservation Listing and Demolition Permit Denial
This procedural provision is cited and relevant to the court's assessment or authority in the matter.
VB.2004.00125 · zh (§ 60 VRG)
Social Assistance Recipient Ordered to Seek Employment
This procedural provision is likely cited in relation to the overall context of administrative review, even if not explicitly in the final orders, it is listed in the cited norms.
VB.2011.00730 · zh (Art. 60 VRG)
Co-Owner Exclusion in Preliminary Building Decision Regarding Public Path Access
This provision was applied in the dispositive concerning the court's decision on the merits, likely relating to the application of the principle of official investigation (Untersuchungsmaxime).
VB.2024.00351 · zh (Art. 60 VRG)
Cantonal Election Validation After Post-Election Party Switch
This provision likely governed the procedure for the decision, as it is listed among the cited norms.
VB.2021.00407 · zh (§ 60 VRG)
Cellular Base Station Permit Appeal: Admissibility of New Environmental Fact Claims Based on Building Attenuation Calculation
This procedural provision is cited under 'Rechtsnormen' and relates to the court's power or limitations regarding the decision (e.g., remediation or correction), relevant because the court mentions the lack of room for curing the defect by way of ancillary determination.
VB.2020.00255 · zh (§ 60 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed Regarding Retroactive Building Permit for Agricultural Zone Agility Course
This procedural provision (Administrative Procedure Act) is cited as applicable law, likely pertaining to the handling of the case or orders.
VB.2019.00174 · zh (§ 60 VRG)
Employee Dismissal Overruled Due to Unlawfully Obtained Evidence in Acquittal Case
Cited as a general procedural norm, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed, it is listed among the cited legal norms.
VB.2016.00294 · zh (Art. 60 VRG)
Tender Suspension Denied in Tram Procurement Dispute
This provision is listed in the section detailing the legal norms applied, suggesting it was relevant to the court's decision framework, although the dispositive itself is an order on suspensive effect.
VB.2014.00593 · zh (§ 60 VRG)
Electricity Charge Dispute and Consumption Period Determination
The appeal was dismissed, and this provision relates to the grounds for rejecting the appeal (implied by the overall outcome of the decision regarding the substance).
UB130132 · zh (§ 60 VRG)
Police Custody Legality and Insufficient Factual Inquiry in Drunken Detention Case
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the investigative duty (Untersuchsungsmaxime) in administrative proceedings, which justified remanding the case for factual clarification.
VB.2012.00338 · zh (§ 60 VRG)
Appeal Against Agricultural Building Permit Approval
This provision is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' and is cited as a procedural or substantive rule applied in the decision.
VB.2012.00389 · zh (§ 60 VRG)
Wooden Shed Restoration Upheld Despite Elapsed Time
Used for the proportionality assessment of the order to restore the legal state.
SB.2011.00031 · zh (Art. 60 VRG)
Late Tax Appeal Dismissed Due to Faulty Service of Notice
This provision is cited and likely relates to the procedural rules governing the administrative appeal process or its handling.
VB.2009.00585 · zh (§ 60 VRG)
Misrepresentation in Public Procurement Bid Justifies Exclusion
This provision was applied regarding the costs of the appeal.