Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
175.2 VRGLPALGA CH-ZH

Art. 5 : Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (126 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 5

1 Bevor eine Verwaltungsbehörde auf die Behandlung einer Prüfung der

Sache eintritt, hat sie von Amtes wegen ihre Zuständigkeit zu prüfen. Zuständigkeit34

1.7.24 - 125

1

175.2

Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)

Ausstand

Vorsorgliche

Massnahmen

Verfahren

mit mehreren

Beteiligten

Sitz im Ausland

2 Eingaben an eine unzuständige Verwaltungsbehörde sind von

Amtes wegen und in der Regel unter Benachrichtigung des Absenders

an die zuständige Verwaltungsbehörde weiterzuleiten. Für die Ein-

haltung der Fristen ist der Zeitpunkt der Einreichung bei der unzustän-

digen Behörde massgebend.

3 Unleserliche, ungebührliche und übermässig weitschweifige Ein-

gaben werden zur Verbesserung zurückgewiesen.34

← Art. 4a Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG) Art. 5a →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (230)

BRGE.IV.Nr.0053.201 · zh (§ 5 Abs. 2 VRG)
Building Appeals Court Jurisdiction Over Recusal Motion Appeal
Used to order the referral of the appeal to the District Council because the court is not competent to handle it.
VB.2008.00240 · zh (§ 5 Abs. 1 VRG)
Applicant v. Building Insurance Authority and Building Appeals Commission
This provision is cited in relation to the decision on functional jurisdiction, specifically mentioning the prior instance (Rekurskommission).
VB.2006.00528 · zh (§ 5 Abs. III VRG)
Dismissal of Appeal for Egregious Procedural Misconduct
This provision is cited in relation to the procedural handling of the appeal.
RG.2003.00006 · zh (§ 5 lit. II VRG)
Challenge to Litigation Value Calculation in Administrative Personnel Law Case
This provision appears in the list of cited legal norms, though its specific application in the final orders is not detailed here.
BRKE.I.Nr.0174.1995 · zh (§ 5 Abs. 2 VRG)
Appeal Jurisdiction for Chimney Sweep Permit Withdrawal Based on Non-Fire Safety Grounds
The appeal is remitted to the competent District Council based on this provision.
PB.2003.00010 · zh (§ 5 Abs. II VRG)
Professor's Direct Appeal Dismissed for Improper Venue.
Applied in the dispositive for the decision on costs concerning the appeal filed by the plaintiff.
PB.2005.00002 · zh (§ 5 Abs. II VRG)
Nurse Denied Appeal Rights Over Wage Claim
Likely cited in relation to the formal requirements for administrative acts, relevant to the discussion of whether the initial letter constituted a Verfügung.
VB.2000.00126 · zh (§ 5 lit. II VRG)
Hospital Care Assignment Subject to Insurance Law, Not Public Procurement Law
This provision is cited in the legal norms section, indicating its relevance to the dispute concerning cantonal administrative procedural law.
VB.2003.00239 · zh (§ 5 lit. II VRG)
Municipality Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing in Guardianship File Release Dispute
The court applied this provision when finding that the municipality lacked standing to appeal the decision regarding file access.
VB.2004.00331 · zh (§ 5 Abs. II VRG)
Exclusion from Selective Study Commission for Late Submission to Wrong Office
This procedural provision regarding forwarding requirements was explicitly discussed and deemed inapplicable in the context of the deadline and submission location in the reasoning leading to the final order.
VB.2006.00313 · zh (§ 5 Abs. 2 VRG)
Municipal Order Compliance and Drainage Cooperative Dispute Appeal
This procedural rule is cited in relation to the overall decision process.
VB.2006.00528 · zh (§ 5 Abs. III VRG)
Dismissal of Social Assistance Appeal Due to Deficient and Abusive Procedural Conduct
This provision is listed as a relevant legal norm concerning the procedural handling or decision in this case.
VB.2008.00240 · zh (§ 5 Abs. 1 VRG)
Inadmissibility of Appeal Regarding Fire Protection Subsidy Rejection Due to Incorrect Appeal Body and Lack of Legal Claim
Cited in connection with the functional competence of the administrative court (which it lacked in this case).
VB.2025.00518 · zh (§ 5 Abs. II VRG)
Complainant Fails to Exhaust Appeal Options, Claims Dismissed
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because the administrative court lacked jurisdiction.
VB.2025.00476 · zh (§ 5 Abs. II VRG)
Oversight Complaint Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction
Used to dismiss the appeal because the administrative court lacks jurisdiction over criminal, civil, or state liability matters.