Art. 49 : Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)

VB.2025.00248 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Supervised Housing Placement Stay Review Dismissed as Moot

The appeal proceedings were struck off as having become without object because the opposing party granted the request during the appeal proceedings (E. 2.2).

VB.2025.00444 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Social Assistance Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing and Lack of Jurisdiction

The court did not enter into the merits of the case because the conditions for entering into the merits were not met.

VB.2025.00089 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Mootness of Detention Suspension Motion After Release

The court ruled that the applicant's request for free legal aid should be rejected due to a lack of proven need.

VB.2024.00683 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Appeal Dismissed Due to Mootness, Costs Awarded to Applicant

This provision was used to justify the refusal of legal aid due to insufficient proof of need.

VB.2022.00346 · zh (Art. 49 VRG)

Property Owner v. Municipality Over Forecourt Market Use

This provision is cited in the context of the general principle governing the decision-making process, which is highly relevant to the final outcome, although not explicitly listed in the dispositive, the case summary suggests a decision based on the merits where procedural rules like the one governing the final judgment structure are paramount. (Note: Without the explicit final dispositive orders, I rely on the case summary's implication that this fundamental procedural provision dictates the final resolution structure, as no other substantive ruling is clearly identifiable from the provided text excerpt.)

VB.2024.00046 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Traffic Order Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing

This provision is cited in the section listing the legal norms applied, suggesting it formed the basis for the decision regarding the appeal's admissibility or substance.

VB.2025.00309 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Expired Protection Order Appeal Lacks Legal Interest

The court did not enter a decision because the appeal lacked the required current and practical interest in challenging the protective measures, as cited for the basis of non-admittance.

VB.2024.00542 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Association Board Membership Dispute and Commercial Register Appeal Standing

This provision addresses the inadmissibility of the appeal due to the lack of a protected interest of the appellants.

VB.2023.00650 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Traffic Order and Road Project Legal Procedures

This provision relates to the admissibility of appeals, specifically regarding the lack of standing of one of the appellants.

VB.2024.00764 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Administrative Court Dismisses Fee Waiver Appeal Due to Lack of Standing; Grants Pro Bono Representation with Reduced Rate

This provision is cited in the dispositive for the decision not to enter upon the appeal (Nichteintreten).

AN.2024.00012 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Standing Challenge to Dog Ordinance Amendment

The court dismissed the appeal based on the lack of standing to appeal (Beschwerdelegitimation).

AN.2024.00014 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Cantonal Dog Ordinance Standing Challenge Dismissed

The court used this provision to declare the application inadmissible due to the lack of standing to appeal (Beschwerdelegitimation).

VB.2025.00025 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Patient Lacks Standing to Appeal Doctor's Medical Ban

The court ruled against proceeding with the appeal due to a lack of legal standing.

VB.2024.00259 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Conditional Release Mootness and Grant of Legal Aid on Appeal

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

VB.2024.00664 · zh (§ 49 VRG)

Dismissal of Appeal Against Interim Ruling on Police Custody Suspension

Cited in relation to the inadmissibility of the appeal due to lack of current interest in challenging the interlocutory decision.