Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
175.2 VRGLPALGA CH-ZH

Art. 38 : Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (126 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 38

50 1 Das Verwaltungsgericht erledigt Streitigkeiten in Dreier- Geschäfts-

besetzung.

erledigung

a. Dreier-

2 Über offensichtlich unbegründete oder offensichtlich begründete besetzung

Rechtsmittel kann es bei Einstimmigkeit auf dem Zirkulationsweg ent-

scheiden.

← Art. 37 Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG) Art. 38a →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (108)

VB.2007.00406 · zh (§ 38 Abs. I VRG)
Industrial Zone Regulation Approval Appeal Dismissal
This provision is listed under the cited legal norms, implying its relevance to the case context, though its direct application in the operative part is only established through the list of cited norms.
VB.2006.00002 · zh (§ 38 Abs. 3 VRG)
Appeal on Pre-Act DNA Sampling and Jurisdictional Competence
This provision is cited in the context of the jurisdictional assessment that leads to the non-admission of the appeal and the referral to another court.
PB.2004.00006 · zh (§ 38 VRG)
Declaratory Relief Inadmissibility in Employment Dispute
This provision was cited in the context of the admissibility of the appeal, although the primary ground for dismissal was § 80 Abs. II VRG.
RG.2003.00006 · zh (§ 38 lit. II VRG)
Challenge to Litigation Value Calculation in Administrative Personnel Law Case
This provision appears in the list of cited legal norms, though its specific application in the final orders is not detailed here.
PB.2002.00049 · zh (§ 38 lit. I VRG)
Nursing Staff Back Pay and Salary Parity Dispute
This provision is listed under applicable legal norms, although its specific role in the dispositive is not detailed beyond the general context of the decision.
PB.2003.00011 · zh (§ 38 VRG)
Municipal Restructuring Termination and Reinstatement Reversal
Cited among the legal norms applicable to the case.
VB.2002.00293 · zh (§ 38 lit. III VRG)
State Church Organization Procurement Law Applicability
This provision is cited in the 'Rechtsnormen' section, which often details the legal basis relevant to the case, though its direct application in the dispositive needs confirmation.
VB.2003.00282 · zh (§ 38 Abs. III VRG)
Appeal Regarding Compulsory Medication During Custodial Measure Enforcement
This procedural rule likely governs the decision-making process or the basis for the court's action regarding the matter at hand.
VB.2006.00002 · zh (§ 38 Abs. 3 VRG)
Appeal Regarding Retroactive DNA Sampling Under DNA Profile Act
Cited in the reasoning regarding the competence of the court.
VB.2007.00406 · zh (§ 38 Abs. I VRG)
Appeal Regarding Scope of Judicial Review over Municipal Zoning Regulations
Cited in the context of the legal norms applicable to the case.
AN.2025.00004 · zh (§ 38 Abs. II VRG)
Appeal Dismissed Over Procedural Costs Dispute
This procedural norm is cited, indicating its application in the context of the decision, likely related to the cost assessment or nature of the dispute.
VB.2025.00229 · zh (§ 38 Abs. II VRG)
Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Procedural Costs
This provision was likely cited in relation to the procedural handling, specifically the decision to dismiss the appeal without granting an extension.
VB.2024.00317 · zh (§ 38 Abs. I lit. c VRG)
Protected Cohabitation and Residence Permit Entitlement
This provision is the legal basis for awarding party compensation in administrative proceedings, which was applied in this case.
VB.2024.00634 · zh (§ 38 Abs. I VRG)
Restitution of Improperly Received Social Assistance Based on Undeclared Bank Accounts
This provision is cited as part of the legal basis concerning the application of procedural law.
VB.2024.00539 · zh (§ 38 Abs. I VRG)
Planning Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing Due to Distant Location
The court dismissed the appeal because the appellants lacked the required standing (schutzwürdiges Interesse).