175.2
VRGLPALGA
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 29a : Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)
Art. 29a
39 1 Öffentlichrechtliche Forderungen der Verwaltungsbehör- Fälligkeit von
den und von Privatpersonen werden 30 Tage seit Zustellung der Rech- Forderungen
nung fällig. Vorbehalten bleiben der Barbezug oder die Vorauszah-
lung, wo dies zur Vereinfachung des Verfahrens angezeigt ist, sowie die
Stundung und Ratenzahlung in begründeten Fällen.
2 Nach Ablauf der Zahlungsfrist wird der Schuldner gemahnt. Ab
Datum der Mahnung schuldet er Verzugszins von 5%.
3 Abweichende Bestimmungen der Steuergesetzgebung bleiben
vorbehalten.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (17)
VB.2022.00519 · zh (§ 29a Abs. 2 VRG)
Caregiver Summary Dismissal Over Late Medication Dispensing Amidst Toxic Workplace
This provision was cited in the context of the decision regarding the substance of the dispute (likely concerning administrative procedural law).
VB.2020.00816 · zh (§ 29a VRG)
Employment Termination Following Rejection of Reassigned Position
This provision was applied to rule on the interest rate calculation regarding the compensation awarded.
VB.2016.00516 · zh (§ 29a Abs. II VRG)
Employment Termination: Right to be Heard Violation
This procedural provision was cited in relation to the assessment of the formal deficiencies of the termination, which impacted the final outcome regarding compensation.
VB.2016.00050 · zh (§ 29a VRG)
Hospital Director Expert Fee Dispute
This provision is cited in relation to the procedural competence of the administrative court to assess the complaint.
VB.2014.00085 · zh (§ 29a Abs. I VRG)
Security Deposit for Legal Costs and Right to Free Legal Representation
Mentioned in relation to the possibility of free legal aid.
VB.2012.00554 · zh (§ 29a Abs. II VRG)
Employment Termination Based on Pre-Employment Conduct and Loss of Trust
This article is cited in the final order as part of the set of provisions governing procedural aspects related to administrative law.
VB.2011.00812 · zh (§ 29a Abs. I VRG)
Refusal of Appeal Based on Unpaid Security Deposit for Procedural Costs
This provision is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' but is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (which are missing, but based on the summary, the decision enforces costs/claims based on § 15 Abs. II lit. b VRG and the non-admission based on failure to pay the bond).
BRKE.I.Nr.0159.2010 · zh (§ 29a Abs. 2 VRG)
Municipal Fee Dispute Over Advertising Structure Duration and Interest Calculation
Cited concerning the due date for default interest payments, which was deemed relevant in the reasoning but not explicitly applied in the final ruling regarding the date.
VB.2009.00685 · zh (§ 29a Abs. 1 Satz 1 VRG)
Property Owner Liability for Retrospectively Demanded Water Connection Fees
Cited as the rule determining that public law claims become due 30 days after invoice delivery, which governs the due date of the supplementary fee.
VB.2009.00685 · zh (§ 29a Abs. I VRG)
Owner Liability for Retroactive Water Connection Fees
Cited as the basis for determining that the revised fee became due 30 days after the service of the decision issuing the supplementary charge.
VB.2011.00812 · zh (§ 29a Abs. I VRG)
Appeal Rejection Due to Unpaid Security Deposit
This provision is listed under the cited legal norms, although its direct application in the dispositive is implicitly linked to the outcome justified by the other provisions.
VB.2014.00085 · zh (§ 29a Abs. I VRG)
Cost Advance Payment Versus Legal Aid Application in Administrative Proceedings
The court ordered the costs of the previous instance to be borne by the lower court (Vorinstanz).
VB.2015.00132 · zh (§ 29a Abs. 2 VRG)
Pay Discrimination Back Pay and Statute of Limitations Waiver Dispute
While cited in the 'Rechtsnormen', it is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders provided, which only refer to 'E. 4' concerning the remittance.
VB.2016.00050 · zh (§ 29a VRG)
Cantonal University Hospital Director Fee Dispute
This provision was implicitly used as the basis for the court's competence to rule on the administrative appeal regarding the fee.
VB.2016.00516 · zh (§ 29a Abs. II VRG)
Employee Termination Justified, but Procedural Violations Lead to Compensation
Cited as the legal basis for the right to be heard in cantonal administrative proceedings, which was violated.