Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
175.2 VRGLPALGA CH-ZH

Art. 28a : Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (126 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 28a

49 1 Bei offensichtlich unzulässigen, gegenstandslos gewor-

denen, offensichtlich unbegründeten oder offensichtlich begründeten

Rechtsmitteln kann die Rekursbehörde

a. bei Einstimmigkeit auf dem Zirkulationsweg entscheiden,

b. den Entscheid summarisch begründen.

2 Bei gegenstandslos gewordenen Rekursen kann auf die Begrün-

dung des Entscheids verzichtet werden. § 10 a lit. b gilt sinngemäss.

12

Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)

D. Vollstreckung

175.2

← Art. 28 Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG) Art. 29 →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)

BRGE.III.Nrn.0108.0 · zh (§ 335 Abs. 1 lit. a des Planungs- und Baugesetzes (PBG) in Verbindung mit § 28a Abs. 1 lit. b des Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetzes (VRG))
Appeals Against Zoning Plan Premature Until Final Approval
Allows the single judge to decide with a summary justification because the appeals are clearly not to be considered.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0016.201 · zh (§ 28a Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Dispute Over Private Road Renovation Cost Settlement and Admissibility of Electronic Submission
Cited in conjunction with § 335 Abs. 2 lit. a PBG for issuing a summarily reasoned single judge decision due to the obvious inadmissibility of the appeal.
VR170001 · zh (§ 28a Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Appeal Regarding Heir's Access to Deceased Father's Case Files Denied
The court invokes this provision as the justification for not engaging in a more detailed discussion of the appellant's submissions because the appeal was clearly unfounded.
VB.2016.00595 · zh (§ 28a Abs. I lit. b VRG)
Appeal Sustained Against Unjustified Award Cancellation
This provision is cited as a legal norm related to the subject matter, likely pertaining to the summary decision procedure mentioned in E. 2.
VB.2012.00786 · zh (§ 28a Abs. 1 VRG)
Public Authority Violated Prohibition of Undue Delay
This provision likely relates to the grounds for appealing a delay, but is not explicitly cited in the dispositive.
VB.2012.00786 · zh (§ 28a Abs. 2 VRG)
Public Authority Violated Prohibition of Undue Delay
This provision likely relates to the consequences of a successful appeal for a delay, but is not explicitly cited in the dispositive.
VB.2012.00179 · zh (§ 28a Abs. I VRG)
Building Permit Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Timely Request Service
Referenced in the context of legal rights.
BRGE.I.Nr.0044.2012 · zh (§ 28a Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Late Appeal of Construction Permit Denied Due to Untimeliness
Cited as the basis for the court to render a decision with summary reasoning due to the obvious inadmissibility of the appeal.
VB.2012.00179 · zh (§ 28a Abs. I VRG)
Appeal Dismissed Due to Untimely Request for Service of Building Permit Decision
This provision is listed among the cited legal norms.
VB.2012.00786 · zh (§ 28a Abs. 1 VRG)
Undue Delay in Legal Proceedings and Cost Allocation for Procedural Error
This provision likely grounds the complaint regarding the violation of the prohibition of legal delay, which was accepted (E. 2.3).
VB.2012.00786 · zh (§ 28a Abs. 2 VRG)
Undue Delay in Legal Proceedings and Cost Allocation for Procedural Error
This provision appears to be related to the treatment of the complaint concerning the violation of the prohibition of legal delay, although the exact application isn't detailed in the summary excerpt.
VB.2016.00595 · zh (§ 28a Abs. I lit. b VRG)
Contract Award Revocation Without Justification
This provision appears to be the legal basis for the court's ruling on the merits, as it is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' and the case concerns the revocation of an award decision.