175.2
VRGLPALGA
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 26 : Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)
Art. 26
50 1 Die Rekursinstanz leitet das Rekursverfahren und berei- Rekurs-
tet den Rekursentscheid unabhängig von der anordnenden Behörde verfahren
vor.
2 Richtet sich der Rekurs gegen die Anordnung einer Direktion
oder einer Kommission, die von einem Mitglied des Regierungsrates
geleitet wird, ist hierfür ein zentraler Rechtsdienst zuständig.
a. Verfahrens-
leitung
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)
VB.2015.00564 · zh (§ 26 Abs. 4 VRG)
State Liability for Professional Invalidity and Procedural Errors in Administrative Decision
This procedural provision appears to be cited in relation to the procedural handling of costs or aspects related to the court's proceedings, as it is listed among the cited norms.
VB.2007.00236 · zh (§ 26 Abs. IV VRG)
Appeal Against Mobile Antenna Permit: Documentation and Radiation Limit Assessment
This article is listed among the legal norms cited in relation to the judgment's outcome, implying its application in the substantive ruling.
VB.2007.00181 · zh (§ 26 Abs. IV VRG)
Building Permit Annulled for Violation of Right to Be Heard on Evidentiary Documents
This procedural rule from the cantonal administrative procedure law was cited in relation to the procedural grounds for the decision.
VB.2005.00320 · zh (§ 26 Abs. II VRG)
Dog Placement Facility Noise Restriction Appeal
Cited as a legal basis in the general context, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.
VB.2002.00317 · zh (§ 26 lit. IV VRG)
Due Process Violation: Failure to Allow Reply to Factual Assertions
Cited in relation to the procedural requirement for a second exchange of written submissions when new facts are introduced.
VB.2000.00165 · zh (§ 26 VRG)
Social Assistance Appeal: Right to be Heard Violation Due to Withheld Documents and Insufficient Reasoning
Cited in relation to the minimum requirements for the content of the appeal brief.
VB.2000.00165 · zh (§ 26 VRG)
Violation of Right to be Heard Due to Insufficient Justification and Lack of Opportunity to Comment on Crucial Documents
The court cited this provision to determine that the content of the appeal brief met the minimum requirements.
VB.2002.00317 · zh (§ 26 lit. IV VRG)
Violation of Right to be Heard in Building Permit Appeal
Cited in the dispositive concerning procedural rules, likely related to the handling of the appeal or hearing rights.
VB.2005.00320 · zh (§ 26 Abs. II VRG)
Appeal Regarding Provisional Measure Limiting Dog Center Capacity
Cited as a legal basis regarding precautionary measures.
VB.2007.00181 · zh (§ 26 Abs. IV VRG)
Right to be Heard Violation in Building Permit Case
Cited as a basis for the return of the case to the lower instance due to a serious violation of the right to be heard.
VB.2008.00116 · zh (§ 26 Abs. 4 VRG)
Manure Facility Remediation and Sewage Connection Order Upheld
This procedural norm is cited in the section regarding the healing of a potential violation of the right to be heard, which is implicitly part of the final ruling on the appeal.
VB.2008.00450 · zh (§ 26 Abs. IV VRG)
Appeal Against Building Permit for Mobile Radio Antenna Installation: Violation of Right to Be Heard and Insufficient Data on Radiation Prognosis
Cited in the record of legal norms, likely governing procedural aspects of the administrative appeal reviewed.
VB.2008.00504 · zh (§ 26 Abs. I VRG)
Due Process Violation in Welfare Denial
Cited in relation to the right to be heard.
VB.2015.00564 · zh (§ 26 Abs. 4 VRG)
State Liability for Occupational Disability Dismissed Due to Statute of Limitations and No Breach of Duty
Used to rule on the imposition of court costs, considering a procedural error by the lower instance.