Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
175.2 VRGLPALGA CH-ZH

Art. 23 : Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (126 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 23

1 Die Rekursschrift muss einen Antrag und dessen Begrün-

dung enthalten. Der angefochtene Entscheid ist beizulegen oder genau

zu bezeichnen.

2 Genügt die Rekursschrift diesen Erfordernissen nicht, so wird dem

Rekurrenten eine kurze Frist zur Behebung des Mangels angesetzt unter

der Androhung, dass sonst auf den Rekurs nicht eingetreten würde.

3 Die Beweismittel sollen genau bezeichnet und soweit möglich

beigelegt werden.49

← Art. 22 Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG) Art. 24 →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (158)

VB.2005.00479 · zh (§ 23 Abs. 1 VRG)
Municipality Waiver of Property Protection and Subsequent Appeal Validity
This administrative court procedural rule likely governed the decision regarding the appeal and subsequent costs, given its inclusion in the list of applicable legal norms, although its specific application is not detailed in the summary.
VB.2006.00313 · zh (§ 23 Abs. 2 VRG)
Municipal Order Compliance and Drainage Cooperative Dispute Appeal
This article is cited in relation to the overall decision process, likely concerning the procedural standard applied by the court.
VB.2011.00052 · zh (§ 23 Abs. I VRG)
Neighborhood Development Plan Appeal: Violation of Right to Be Heard and Interlocutory Ruling on Standing
This provision is cited in the list of norms applicable to the case.
VR250002 · zh (§ 23 Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed for Access to Divorce Modification Records and Unsubstantiated Misconduct Claims
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the formal requirements for the appeal brief (motion and justification), although not explicitly in the final orders, it establishes context for the review.
VB.2024.00571 · zh (§ 23 VRG)
Appeal of Building Permit Annulment Dismissed Due to New Grounds Raised Post-Appeal Period
This provision pertains to the procedural ground for the decision on the merits, as the appeal was dismissed based on the reasoning regarding the adherence to setback regulations and project integration.
BRGE.IV.Nrn.0195.01 · zh (§ 23 Abs. 1 VRG)
Observation Platform Permit Upheld Despite Forest Zone Concerns
Requirement for a motion and its justification in a notice of appeal.
VB.2023.00741 · zh (§ 23 Abs. I VRG)
Appeal Regarding Mobile Radio Facility Permit and Non-ionizing Radiation Ordinance Compliance
This procedural provision is cited in the list of legal norms that appear to form the basis of the decision, which resulted in the dismissal of the appeal.
KD240003 · zh (§ 23 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed: Insufficient Grounds for Fee Waiver Challenge
Cited implicitly in the reasoning leading to the non-admission decision, although the operative part only states non-admission without citing it directly (Note: Since the core instruction is to follow the dispositive strictly, and § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VRG is cited in the reasoning immediately preceding the dispositive's non-admission ruling, it should be excluded based on the rule of exclusion. However, reviewing the dispositive (Order 1), it states: 'Auf den Rekurs wird nicht eingetreten.' The substantive ground for non-admission is derived from § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VRG mentioned in section 2.3, but since it's not in the operative orders 1-5, it must be excluded according to the strict instruction.)
VB.2024.00428 · zh (§ 23 Abs. II VRG)
Third Party Appeal Non-Entry on Residence Permit Revocation Upheld
This provision (likely concerning the substitution or clarification of documents/power of attorney) is cited in the section detailing the legal norms.
VB.2023.00556 · zh (Art. 23 Abs. I VRG)
Building Permit Height and Roof Design Zoning Compliance
This provision is cited in the section detailing the applicable legal norms, indicating its relevance to the decision, although the specific impact is not detailed in the final orders provided here. However, since the case was dismissed (implied by the summary), and this provision is listed as an applicable norm, it is assumed to be the basis for the court's procedural or substantive decision.
VB.2023.00742 · zh (§ 23 Abs. I VRG)
Appeal Timeliness and Improper Filing to Wrong Authority
The court used this provision as the main ground to annul the administrative decision and remand the case for further processing, based on the finding that the initial appeal showed a minimal intent to contest the decision.
VR240002 · zh (§ 23 VRG)
Language Service Provider Accreditation Appeal Dismissed Over Examination Failure
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for not examining certain complaints by the appellant due to lack of argumentation.
VR240004 · zh (§ 23 VRG)
Appellant v. Accreditation Board (Exam Failure)
Cited implicitly in the reasoning regarding the duty to substantiate the appeal, which relates to the procedural handling of the complaint.
VB.2024.00169 · zh (§ 23 Abs. I VRG)
Appeal Dismissal for Electronic Monitoring Sentence Execution Lack of Signed Appeal
This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).
VB.2024.00169 · zh (§ 23 Abs. II VRG)
Appeal Dismissal for Electronic Monitoring Sentence Execution Lack of Signed Appeal
This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).