175.2
VRGLPALGA
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 21b : Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)
Art. 21b
63 1 Zur Anfechtung eines Erlasses ist berechtigt, wer durch
eine Norm in schutzwürdigen Interessen berührt werden könnte.
2 § 21 Abs. 2 gilt sinngemäss.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (23)
AN.2024.00012 · zh (§ 21b Abs. I VRG)
Standing Challenge to Dog Ordinance Amendment
The court declared that it would not enter into the merits of the case (Nichteintreten) based on the lack of standing.
AN.2024.00014 · zh (§ 21b Abs. I VRG)
Cantonal Dog Ordinance Standing Challenge Dismissed
This procedural norm was cited in relation to the decision on admissibility.
AN.2022.00004 · zh (§ 21b Abs. I VRG)
Mootness in Abstract Norm Control of Healthcare Regulation Extension
Cited in relation to the court's procedural decision regarding the nature of the dispute (not a personnel law dispute).
AN.2021.00030 · zh (§ 21b Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Moot Due to Repealed COVID-19 Education Regulations
This provision is cited in relation to the case being dismissed as having become moot due to the repeal of the contested regulation.
AN.2021.00013 · zh (§ 21b VRG)
Parents' Challenge to Mandatory Covid-19 Protective Measures in Primary Schools
This procedural provision was cited among the relevant legal norms.
AN.2021.00014 · zh (§ 21b VRG)
Cantonal Covid-19 School Measures Upheld
Cited in the list of norms, although its specific application in the final orders is not explicitly detailed based on the summary provided.
AN.2021.00010 · zh (§ 21b VRG)
Father Challenges Secondary School Mask Mandate Based on Vaccination Status
This article, dealing with costs or procedural matters, might be relevant for the final disposition, but its specific application in the operative orders is not detailed here.
AN.2021.00023 · zh (§ 21b Abs. I VRG)
COVID-19 Visitor Certificate Requirement Upheld in Healthcare Facilities
Cited as the basis for the court's decision on the admissibility of the case, particularly regarding virtual affectedness.
AN.2020.00021 · zh (§ 21b Abs. 1 VRG)
Legislator Standing to Challenge Compensation Ordinance Entry into Force
This provision is cited in the context of the court deciding not to enter into the merits (Nichteintreten) due to the appellant lacking a specific interest to sue.
AN.2020.00013 · zh (§ 21b VRG)
Challenge to COVID-19 Indoor Mask Mandate Upheld
This article is listed among the legal norms cited in the decision, although its specific role in the operative part is not detailed, it is part of the referenced legal framework.
AN.2020.00014 · zh (Art. 21b VRG)
Cantonal Covid-19 Measures Lawful Despite Expired Status
This provision is cited in the list of legal norms and is likely related to the procedural aspect or the court's general jurisdiction, though the dispositive is summarized here.
AN.2020.00015 · zh (§ 21b VRG)
Regulation's Pandemic Measures Upheld Against Fundamental Rights Challenge
This provision is cited in relation to the concept of abstract norm control.
AN.2020.00016 · zh (Art. 21b VRG)
Challenge to COVID-19 Mask Mandate Dismissed as Capable of Recurrence
This provision is cited as a general legal norm, although its direct application in the final orders is not explicitly detailed as the main ground, it is listed among the cited norms.
VB.2020.00136 · zh (§ 21b Abs. I VRG)
Municipal Energy Plan Not Directly Actionable; Appellant Lacks Standing
The court used this provision to dismiss the appeal because the complainant's status as a taxpayer and voter did not grant them the necessary personal interest required for standing.
AN.2019.00003 · zh (§ 21b Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Regarding Differential Treatment of Experience Grades in Upper Secondary School Admission
This provision of the cantonal administrative procedure regulation was part of the legal framework reviewed.