175.2
VRGLPALGA
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 10c : Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG)
Art. 10c
49 1 Wer ein schutzwürdiges Interesse hat, kann von der Realakte
Behörde, die für Handlungen zuständig ist, welche sich auf öffentliches a. Im
Recht stützen und Rechte oder Pflichten berühren, verlangen, dass sie: Allgemeinen
a. widerrechtliche Handlungen unterlässt, einstellt oder widerruft,
b. die Folgen widerrechtlicher Handlungen beseitigt,
c. die Widerrechtlichkeit von Handlungen feststellt.
2 Die Behörde erlässt eine Anordnung.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (62)
VB.2024.00669 · zh (§ 10c VRG)
Appealability of Precautionary Measures in Automatic Traffic Enforcement
Cited in the context of the procedural requirements related to the administrative action.
VB.2022.00190 · zh (§ 10c VRG)
Road Authority Water Barrier Dispute Jurisdiction Reassignment
The treatment of the appellant's request as an application for a decision on factual acts was assessed against this provision.
VB.2020.00875 · zh (§ 10c Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Applicant v. Emergency Assistance Benefits Withholding
Used as the legal basis that the court considered in relation to the lack of a legitimate interest in a declaratory judgment.
VB.2020.00875 · zh (§ 10c Abs. 2 VRG)
Applicant v. Emergency Assistance Benefits Withholding
Cited in connection with the lack of a legitimate interest in issuing an order under this provision.
VB.2022.00555 · zh (§ 10c VRG)
Maskless Demonstrator's Exclusion Found Disproportionate
This provision was considered in relation to the unlawfulness of the measure.
VB.2022.00091 · zh (§ 10c VRG)
Municipality Cemetery Closure Regulation Dispute
The court partially annulled the decision and remanded the case for a substantive review of the request based on this provision concerning real acts.
VB.2022.00465 · zh (§ 10c VRG)
Public Health Removal Order Legality and Appealability
The court determined that a request for a declaratory ruling on the legality of an act of real enforcement (§ 10c VRG) was admissible because the police removal order affects the rights and obligations of the person removed.
VB.2022.00157 · zh (§ 10c VRG)
Reconsideration of Animal Ban Denied Due to Lack of Compliance
Basis for the Veterinary Office's refusal to consider the reopening request.
VB.2021.00242 · zh (§ 10c Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Detainee Restraint Case
The court used this provision to establish the unlawfulness of the real act (restraint with ankle monitors).
VB.2020.00700 · zh (§ 10c Abs. I lit. c VRG)
Data Protection: Admissibility of Declaration of Unlawfulness in Data Processing Disputes
This procedural rule likely governed the handling of costs or similar procedural aspects in the final order, given its inclusion in the cited norms.
VB.2020.00378 · zh (§ 10c VRG)
Appeal Concerning Narcotics Prescription Declaration and Appealability of Cantonal Communication
This provision is cited, suggesting it may relate to the requirements for the administrative act or procedure being challenged.
VB.2020.00518 · zh (§ 10c VRG)
Detainee's Attempt to Revoke Medical Certificate Denied Due to Availability of Direct Dispensation Procedure
The lack of a protected interest in the requested revocation of the medical certificate was based on the availability of a procedure regulated by this provision.
VB.2020.00267 · zh (§ 10c Abs. I VRG)
Prisoner's Indigence and Appeal Merit Partially Granted
This provision is cited as the legal basis for declaring the application for legal aid inadmissible due to lack of necessity.
VB.2020.00267 · zh (§ 10c Abs. II VRG)
Prisoner's Indigence and Appeal Merit Partially Granted
This provision is cited in relation to the partially granting of the application for free legal aid for the appeal proceedings.
VB.2020.00014 · zh (§ 10c VRG)
Unlawful Police Stop Based on Insufficient Grounds
This procedural provision concerning legal aid was cited, implying its potential relevance to the costs or procedural aspect of the final orders, although the actual dispositive orders are missing.