281.1 EGSCHKGLALP

CH-VS

Art. 25 Einführungsgesetz zum Bundesgesetz über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (EGSchKG) - Entscheid

Beschwerdebehörde und Beschwerde - Beschwerde

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (38 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 25 EGSchKG · Entscheid

1. Die untere Behörde entscheidet innert 30 Tagen seit Abschluss der Untersuchung.

2. Die untere Behörde, welche eine Beschwerde als begründet erklärt, verfügt die Aufhebung oder die Berichtigung der angefochtenen Handlung; sie ordnet die Vollziehung von Handlungen an, deren Vornahme das Amt unbegründetermassen verweigert oder verzögert.

3. Der Entscheid enthält kurz den Gang des Verfahrens, die wichtigsten Erklärungen der Parteien, den Sachverhalt und die Begründung.

4. Er wird den Parteien, dem betroffenen Amt und anderen allenfalls Interessierten schriftlich zugestellt.

5. Gebühren werden keine erhoben, eine Prozessentschädigung wird nicht zugesprochen. Vorbehalten bleibt Artikel 20a Absatz 1 SchKG im Falle von böswilliger oder mutwilliger Beschwerdeführung.

6. Der Entscheid wird datiert und unterzeichnet; er weist auf das Rechtsmittel und die Rechtsmittelfrist hin, welche ab Zustellung läuft.

← Art. 24 EGSchKG Einführungsgesetz zum Bundesgesetz über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (EGSchKG) - Grundsätze Art. 26 EGSchKG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (13)

LP 25 8 · vs (art. 25 al. 5 et 27 al. 2 LALP)

Appeal Against Provisional Attachment Dismissed Due to Failure to Timely Object to Jurisdiction

Cited in the dispositive for the decision not to collect judicial costs and not to award legal fees.

LP 24 27 · vs (Art. 25 al. 5 LALP)

Appeal Regarding Public Auction Procedure for Partnership Share Liquidation

Cited in the dispositive concerning the non-levying of judicial costs and the non-allocation of legal costs.

LP 24 14 · vs (Art. 25 Abs. 5 EGSchKG)

Appeal Dismissed: Lack of Statutory Ground for Revision of Debt Enforcement Supervisory Decision

Cited as the basis for the principle that proceedings before cantonal supervisory authorities in debt enforcement and bankruptcy matters are generally free of charge.

LP 24 15 · vs (Art. 25 Abs. 5 EGSchKG)

Appeal Against Discontinuation of Proceedings Due to Mootness in Debt Enforcement

Cited as part of the basis for the decision regarding costs (no costs levied).

LP 24 29 · vs (art. 25 al. 5 et 27 al. 2 LALP)

Appellant v. Supervisory Authority concerning Debt Discharge Action Abandonment and Fee Payment Deadline

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for not collecting judicial costs and not allocating legal costs.

LP 24 25 · vs (art. 25 al. 5 LALP)

Appeal Regarding Validity of Wage Garnishment After Defective Initial Notification

Cited in the final order (No. 3) as the basis for not collecting judicial fees and not awarding costs.

LP 24 25 · vs (art. 25 al. 5 LALP)

Appeal Regarding Validity of Wage Garnishment After Defective Initial Notification

Cited in the reasoning (section 15.3) as the basis for not collecting judicial fees and not awarding costs.

LP 22 34 · vs (Art. 25 al. 5 LALP)

Special Administrator Fees Reduction for Insufficient Detail in Bankruptcy Management

Cited in the dispositive order regarding the non-collection of judicial costs and non-allocation of legal costs.

LP 24 6 · vs (art. 25 al. 5 LALP)

Appeal Regarding Enforcement Against Jointly Owned Real Estate vs. Debtor's Partnership Share

Cited in the decision regarding the non-charging of judicial costs and non-allocation of legal costs for the appeal procedure.

LP 22 22 · vs (Art. 25 al. 5 et 27 al. 2 LALP)

Appeal Regarding Inclusion of Water Rights in Bankruptcy Inventory

Cited in the dispositive regarding both the non-collection of costs and the non-allocation of legal fees.

LP 14 4 · vs (Art. 25 al. 5 LALP)

Foreclosure Valuation Challenge Timeliness Appeal

Cited in the dispositive for the decision not to impose costs or legal aid.

LP 13 58 · vs (Art. 25 Abs. 5 i.V.m. Art. 27 Abs. 2 EGSchKG)

Debt Collection Seizure Appeal Dismissed for Defective Petition

Cited as the basis for not imposing costs or awarding party compensation in this specific appeal procedure.

LP 11 47 · vs (Art. 25 Abs. 5 i.V.m. Art. 27 Abs. 2 EGSchKG)

Appeal Dismissed: Debt Enforcement Proceedings Challenges

Cited as a procedural basis for the costs (no costs and no party compensation).