Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
711 CH-LU

§ 7 Verordnung zum Schutz des Baldegger- und des Hallwilersees und ihrer Ufer - Sperrgebiete

Wasserzone
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (23 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

§ 7 Verordnung zum Schutz des Baldegger- und des Hallwilersees und ihrer Ufer · Sperrgebiete

1. Sperrgebiete sind Teile der Wasserzone. Sie sind in den Plänen eingezeichnet und werden in geeigneter Weise markiert.

2. In den Sperrgebieten sind sämtliche Erholungs- und Sportaktivitäten verboten. Vorbehalten sind besondere Vereinbarungen der Dienststelle Landwirtschaft und Wald mit Fischereiverbänden über die Sportfischerei.

3. Von diesem Verbot ausgenommen sind folgende Aktivitäten von Seeanstössern

a. das Durchfahren der Sperrgebiete mit Booten auf kürzester Strecke von rechtmässig erstellten Bootsanlagen aus,

b. das Schwimmen ausserhalb des Schilfgürtels.

← § 6 Verordnung zum Schutz des Baldegger- und des Hallwilersees und ihrer Ufer Zweck § 8 Verordnung zum Schutz des Baldegger- und des Hallwilersees und ihrer Ufer →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (20)

VVGE.2011.13.Nr.26 · ow (Art. 7 EntG)
Municipality Granted Expropriation Rights for Property Access Improvement
This provision is cited in relation to the procedure following the granting of the expropriation permit, specifically the public plan display.
BGE 122 II 103 (Art. 7 Abs. 3 EntG)
Railway plan approval: parallel routing of high-speed line and national highway within mandated safety distance and microbial contamination risk to adjacent food facility.
Substantive provision applied in the reasoning, requiring protective measures against microbial immissions affecting the cheese center.
A-4113/2021 (Art. 7 – 10 EntG)
Lawful Expropriation for Road Tunnel Construction Site Installation
Refer to protective, restoration, and replacement measures in expropriation law.
III 2021 17 · sz (§ 7 Abs. 1 lit. b EntG)
Administrative Court Upholds Dismissal of Expropriation Claim Against Neighbor's Construction
Cited as one of the grounds for expropriation, specifically concerning neighborhood rights.
A-1239/2012 (Art. 7 Abs. 2 EntG)
National Road Authority to Fund Cable Conduit Relocation
Relates to making expropriation objections and requests for compensation or performance.
A-3716/2010 (Art. 7 cpv. 3 LEspr)
Construction Company Liable for Property Damage Due to Blasting Vibrations
Obligation of the expropriator to protect the public and neighboring properties from dangers and inconveniences.
50.2005.27 · ti (art. 7 cpv. 3 Lespr.)
State Renunciation of Expropriation Compensation Limits
This provision determines the scope of compensation due following the renunciation of expropriation.
10.2004.134.1 · ti (art. 7 Lespr.)
Expropriation Authority v. Property Owner (De Facto Servitude)
The general principles concerning indemnity for expenses when the expropriating authority renounces the expropriation were discussed extensively, influencing the final decision on compensation.
10.2004.134.1 · ti (art. 7 Lespr. cpv. 1)
Expropriation Authority v. Property Owner (De Facto Servitude)
Cited in reasoning (Consideration 5) regarding the deadline for the expropriating authority to renounce the expropriation.
10.2004.134.1 · ti (art. 7 Lespr. cpv. 2)
Expropriation Authority v. Property Owner (De Facto Servitude)
Cited in reasoning (Consideration 5) regarding the obligation of the expropriating authority to reimburse justified expenses upon renunciation.
10.2004.134.1 · ti (art. 7 Lespr. cpv. 3 Lespr.)
Expropriation Authority v. Property Owner (De Facto Servitude)
Used to justify recognizing certain miscellaneous expenses as fair compensation related to the protective measures for the substitute parking spaces.
10.2004.134.1 · ti (art. 7 Lespr. cpv. 5)
Expropriation Authority v. Property Owner (De Facto Servitude)
Cited in reasoning (Consideration 5) regarding the reservation of damage compensation due to the expropriation ban.
10.2004.134.1 · ti (art. 7 cpv. 3 Lespr.)
Expropriation Authority v. Property Owner (De Facto Servitude)
Used to justify recognizing certain miscellaneous expenses as fair compensation related to the protective measures for the substitute parking spaces.
10.2004.134.2 · ti (art. 7 Lespr.)
Expropriation Without Formal Taking: Loss of Access and Parking
The court's ruling on indemnities, based on the expropriating authority's renunciation, relies on the principles derived from this article (discussed in point 5 of the reasoning).
50.1999.15 · ti (art. 7 Lespr)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Material Expropriation Claim from Zoning Changes
Cited in the preamble of the final orders, though the core decision rests on procedural and constitutional grounds applied in the orders.