711
CH-LU
CH-LU
§ 21 Verordnung zum Schutz des Baldegger- und des Hallwilersees und ihrer Ufer - Strafbestimmungen
Widerhandlungen
§ 21 Verordnung zum Schutz des Baldegger- und des Hallwilersees und ihrer Ufer · Strafbestimmungen
1. Wer vorsätzlich und ohne Berechtigung geschütztes Gebiet zerstört oder schwer beschädigt, wird gemäss § 53 Absatz 1 des Gesetzes über den Natur- und Landschaftsschutz mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu einem Jahr oder Geldstrafe bestraft. In leichten Fällen oder wenn der Täter fahrlässig handelt, ist die Strafe Busse bis 40 000 Franken.
2. Wer die Vorschriften der §§ 6 Absatz 1, 7 Absatz 2, 8 Absätze 2 und 3, 12 Absatz 3 und 17 Absatz 2 verletzt, wird gemäss § 53 Absatz 2 des Gesetzes über den Natur- und Landschaftsschutz mit Busse bis zu 20 000 Franken, in leichten Fällen bis zu 5000 Franken bestraft.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)
A-2600/2018 (art. 21 al. 1 LEx)
Expropriation Compensation for Railway Project Land and Tunnel Servitudes
This article specifies that the valuation of real estate must consider existing encumbrances like usufructs, leases, and rights registered in the land register.
A-2600/2018 (art. 21 al. 2 LEx)
Expropriation Compensation for Railway Project Land and Tunnel Servitudes
This article addresses the deduction of compensation for rights such as pre-emption, option, and redemption rights annotated in the land register.
A-2600/2018 (art. 21 al. 2 LEx)
Expropriation Compensation for Railway Project Land and Tunnel Servitudes
This article deals with the deduction of compensation when other personal rights are registered.
A-6912/2017 (Art. 21 al. 1 LEx)
Easement compensation for public park land in railway expropriation.
Cited for the estimation of market value considering existing encumbrances like servitudes, usufructs, leases, and tenancies registered in the land register.
A-6912/2017 (Art. 21 al. 2 LEx)
Easement compensation for public park land in railway expropriation.
Cited for deduction of compensation for other personal rights registered in the land register.
100 2013 35 · be (Art. 21 Abs. 1 EntG)
Cantonal Administrative Court Upholds Expropriation Compensation for Road Expansion
Cited in the reasoning regarding the relevant timing for compensation calculation, but not explicitly in the dispositive.
10.2004.91.1 · ti (art. 21 let. b Lespr.)
Landowner Challenge to Lakeside Property Expropriation Success Due to Procedural Defects
The annulment of the procedure (Order 1) was based on the finding that the documentation presented was insufficient, violating the requirement to include a project detailing the nature, location, extent, and cost of the work, as stated in this article (Para 5.2).
10.2006.7.1 · ti (art. 21 lett. b Lespr.)
Expropriation Annulled Due to Formal Defects in Ownership Identification and Project Documentation
This article requiring the expropriation acts to include a project description was cited in the reasoning to establish the grounds for nullity in order 1.
10.2006.7.1 · ti (art. 21 lett. d Lespr.)
Expropriation Annulled Due to Formal Defects in Ownership Identification and Project Documentation
Although this article defining a formal requirement (the expropriation table) was cited in the reasoning to establish the grounds for nullity, the actual annulment of the procedure in order 1 is based on the cumulative, un-named grave formal flaws discussed throughout the reasoning, which include the violation of this requirement.
20.2004.5.1 · ti (art. 21 Lespr.)
Expropriation Compensation Dispute for Road Improvements
Cited in reasoning regarding the validity of conditions on the expropriation table, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.
20.2004.5.2 · ti (art. 21 Lespr.)
Expropriation Compensation for Road Improvements
Cited in relation to the questionable validity of the condition imposed on vegetation removal compensation.
20.2004.5.2 · ti (art. 21 Lespr.)
Expropriation Compensation for Road Improvements
Mentioned in connection with the validity of imposing conditions on compensation for vegetation removal.
10.2004.91 · ti (art. 21 let. b Lespr.)
Municipality Expropriation Annulled Due to Procedural Defects in Land Seizure
This provision specifies the required content of expropriation files, including the project description, which was found to be deficient, leading to the annulment.
10.2011.6 · ti (art. 21 let. a, b Lespr)
*Municipality Expropriation Annulled Due to Non-Definitive Project*
This provision, which details the required documentation (report on the work and project), was cited in the reasoning to establish the procedural defect that led to the annulment of the expropriation procedure.