700 EGUSG

CH-LU

§ 15 Einführungsgesetz zum Bundesgesetz über den Umweltschutz (EGUSG) - Emissionsverbund

Luftreinhaltung - Massnahmenplan bei Luftverunreinigungen

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (53 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

§ 15 EGUSG · Emissionsverbund

1. Hat die zuständige kantonale Behörde die Emissionsbegrenzungen verschärft, können die Inhaberinnen oder Inhaber von Emissionsquellen, die von der Verschärfung betroffen sind, mit Zustimmung der zuständigen kantonalen Behörde einen Emissionsverbund bilden.

2. Bei einem Emissionsverbund wird nicht die Emission der einzelnen Anlage beurteilt, sondern die Summe aller Emissionen aus dem Verbund.

3. Die zuständige kantonale Behörde stimmt dem Verbund zu, wenn

a. der gesamte Ausstoss der betreffenden Schadstoffe mindestens 15 Prozent tiefer ist als die Summe der zulässigen Emissionen der einzelnen Emissionsquellen,

b. der Verbund gleiche oder ähnliche Schadstoffe betrifft,

c. die Emissionsquellen in einem für die Lufthygiene relevanten räumlichen Zusammenhang stehen,

d. die Kontrolle der Emissionen gewährleistet ist und

e. der Verbund nicht zu einer übermässigen regionalen Ballung von Emissionen führt.

4. Sie kann ihre Zustimmung zum Verbund entziehen, wenn die Bedingungen dafür nicht mehr gegeben sind.

← § 14 EGUSG Einführungsgesetz zum Bundesgesetz über den Umweltschutz (EGUSG) - Kanton § 16 EGUSG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (20)

7H 23 59 · lu (Art. 15 Abs. 2 RPG)

Cantonal Zoning Revision Upheld Against Property Owner Appeal

This provision on the reduction of oversized development zones forms the legal basis for the required zoning changes that were upheld by the court's decision.

7H 22 165 · lu (Art. 15 Abs. 2 RPG)

Cantonal Rezoning of Building Land to Agricultural Use Upheld Against Owner Appeal

The main ground for upholding the appeal rejection is that the zoning change (rezoning) is required by this provision concerning oversized building zones.

7H 22 165 · lu (Art. 15 Abs. 4 lit. c RPG)

Cantonal Rezoning of Building Land to Agricultural Use Upheld Against Owner Appeal

Cited in context of avoiding fragmentation of cultivated land.

7H 21 276 · lu (Art. 15 Abs. 2 RPG)

Building Permit Appeal Standing Denial

Cited in the reasoning section concerning the obligation to reduce oversized building zones, although this specific article was not cited in the final operative orders beyond the header, it is contextually relevant to the analysis which preceded the ultimate ruling on admissibility.

7H 21 236 · lu (Art. 15 Abs. 2 RPG)

Land Rezoning Upheld Against Owner's Appeal on Procedural Grounds

The appeal was dismissed because the court found the reduction of oversized building zones, mandated by this article, outweighed the private interest of the appellant.

7H 20 181 · lu (Art. 15 Abs. 1 RPG)

Appeal Allowed Against Piecemeal Municipal Design Plan Revision

This provision concerns the planning horizon for building zones, which was used implicitly in the context of justifying the review of an old development plan.

7H 18 155 · lu (Art. 15 Abs. 4 lit. a RPG)

Rezoning Affirmation Despite Green Zone Access Conflict

This article establishes the requirement that land must be suitable for building, which the court used to examine the admissibility of the zoning.

7H 18 231 · lu (Art. 15 Abs. 2 RPG)

Cantonal Authority to Issue Provisional Planning Zone to Enforce Federal Zoning Compliance

This provision establishes the public interest (reduction of oversized building zones) that justifies the issuance of the planning zone.

7H 18 11 · lu (Art. 15 RPG)

Building Permit Revocation Based on Post-Permit Zoning Change

Cited to establish that the Weilerzone cannot be qualified as a building zone under federal law.

RRE Nr 195 · lu (Art. 15 RPG)

Administrative Council Overturns Zoning Change on Productive Land

This provision defines the criteria for building zones, which the court implicitly addressed when denying the suitability of the farming reserve land for construction.

V 07 280 · lu (Art. 15 RPG)

Zoning Revision Upheld Despite Odor Concerns Near Pig Farm

The suitability of the zoned land for residential use, in connection with Art. 3 Abs. 3 lit. b RPG, is the central question for upholding the zoning.

V 07 6 1 · lu (Art. 15 lit. b RPG)

Neighboring Owners v. Municipality (Improper Rezoning of Land Near Protected Monastery Site)

The court addresses the failure to apply Article 15 lit. b RPG regarding the dimensioning of building zones when assessing material objections.

V 02 284 · lu (Art. 15 RPG)

Administrative Court Upholds Rezoning of Agricultural Land to Residential Use

Cited as the main provision concerning the criteria for the dimensioning of building zones, which was assessed against the zoning decision.

V 02 284 · lu (Art. 15 lit. b RPG)

Administrative Court Upholds Rezoning of Agricultural Land to Residential Use

Cited specifically regarding the criterion of land requirement within the 15-year planning horizon.

V 01 188 · lu (Art. 15 lit. b RPG)

Municipal Zoning Revision Upheld Against Neighbor Appeals

The appeal was rejected because the administrative court found no violation of this provision regarding the size of the building zone, considering the municipality's planning discretion.