700
PolGLPol
CH-BL
CH-BL
§ 33 Polizeigesetz (PolG) - Verwertung und Entsorgung
Legitimation, polizeiliche Massnahmen, polizeilicher Zwang und Rechtsschutz - Polizeiliche Massnahmen
§ 33 PolG · Verwertung und Entsorgung
1. Eine sichergestellte Sache darf verwertet werden, wenn
a. sie von der berechtigten Person trotz Aufforderung nicht innert 3 Monaten abgeholt wird, wobei die Verwertungsfolge in der Abholungsaufforderung anzudrohen ist;
b. niemand Anspruch auf die Sache erhebt;
c. die Sache schneller Wertverminderung ausgesetzt ist;
d. ihre Verwahrung, Pflege oder Erhaltung mit unverhältnismässig hohen Kosten oder Schwierigkeiten verbunden ist.
2. Sichergestellte Sachen können entsorgt werden, wenn
a. die Voraussetzungen der Verwertung vorliegen und die Aufwendungen für die Aufbewahrung und Verwertung den erzielbaren Erlös offensichtlich übersteigen;
b. die Vernichtung zur Abwehr einer unmittelbar drohenden Gefahr für die öffentliche Sicherheit und Ordnung erforderlich erscheint.
3. Die Sicherheitsdirektion ist zuständig für die Verwahrung, Versteigerung, Verwertung und Entsorgung von sichergestellten Sachen. Das Nähere regelt der Regierungsrat.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (19)
810.24.1 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 2 RPG)
Tenants and Neighbors Lack Standing to Protect Anthroposophical Buildings
The court found no violation of the minimum requirement for cantonal legal protection.
2023.02.08.vv.3 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. a RPG)
Neighbors v. Building Authority: Zoning, Tree Preservation, and Environmental Impact Review
Provision requiring cantonal law to ensure at least the same extent of legitimacy for appeals as for appeals to the Federal Court.
2019.05.15.vv.1 · bl (Art. 33 RPG)
Court Blocks Development Over Neglected Historical Factory Buildings
Cited in the context of the dual review possibility for municipal land-use plans, covering approval by a cantonal authority and the possibility of appeal.
2019.05.08.vv.1 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. b RPG)
Municipality's Zoning Plan for Landscape Area Partially Overturned
This provision requires cantonal law to ensure full judicial review of land-use plans.
810.18.153 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. b RPG)
Municipality Zoning Plan for Landscape Area: Residential Use and Protection Zones Litigation
Used to state that cantonal law must ensure full review of land use plans by at least one appellate authority.
2019.01.23.vv.1 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. b RPG)
Restaurant Renovation Aesthetics Versus Zoning Compliance
Cited to confirm that the cantonal review scope meets the requirements of federal law concerning the full review of appropriateness in similar cases.
810.15.260 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. b RPG)
Municipality's Fossil Fuel Ban Upheld on Environmental Grounds
Cited to ensure full review of land-use plans by at least one appellate authority.
2016.09.28.vv.4 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 4 RPG)
Mixed-Water Basin Exception Permit Upheld, Cost Allocation Remanded
This article mandates uniform appeal instances for decisions related to projects requiring multiple permits, relevant to the procedural coordination aspects of the case.
2016.08.31.vv.2 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. b RPG)
Zoning Plan Annulled Over Inadequate Non-Motorized Traffic Infrastructure
Used to explain the scope of review for zoning plans, ensuring a full review by at least one appellate authority.
2014.09.03.vv.1 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 4 RPG)
Hydroelectric concession overturned due to fragmented appeal process.
This provision requires uniform appellate instances for challenging decisions subject to Article 25a Paragraph 1 RPG, which was violated by the separate appeal paths for the building and concession permits, leading to the annulment of the Regierungsrat's decision.
2013.03.20.vv.3 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. b RPG)
Property Owner Access Road Appeal: Curb Height and Safety Concerns
Requires a full review, including appropriateness, by at least one independent appeal body.
810.08.390 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. b RPG)
Zoning Plan Revision Upheld: Municipal Autonomy and Executive Review Confirmed
This provision was used to determine that the cantonal court's jurisdiction, limited to reviewing legal violations and factual errors, was sufficient, as it did not require an assessment of appropriateness in this case.
copy.of.2009.28 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. b RPG)
Municipal Zoning Plan Revision and Judicial Review
This provision requires a full review of the challenged decisions and zoning plans by at least one appeal authority, and is discussed in relation to the cantonal court's scope of review.
2007.9 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. b RPG)
Zoning of temporary sporting event parking facility and environmental violations
Referred to regarding the extent of review by appeal bodies in spatial planning matters.
2007.7 · bl (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. a RPG)
Zoning Conformity of Farmhouse and Accessory Building
This provision mandates that cantonal law must guarantee the right of appeal to at least the same extent as for appeals in public law matters to the Federal Court.