Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
101 CH-BL

§ 29 Vertrag über die Aufnahme des bernischen Amtsbezirks Laufen und seiner Gemeinden Blauen, Brislach, Burg im Leimental, Dittingen, Duggingen, Grellingen, Laufen, Liesberg, Nenzlingen, Roggenburg, Röschenz, Wahlen, Zwingen in den Kanton Basel-Landschaft - Kreisgeometer

Besondere Bestimmungen - Organisation - Kanton
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (112 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

§ 29 Vertrag über die Aufnahme des bernischen Amtsbezirks Laufen und seiner Gemeinden Blauen, Brislach, Burg im Leimental, Dittingen, Duggingen, Grellingen, Laufen, Liesberg, Nenzlingen, Roggenburg, Röschenz, Wahlen, Zwingen in den Kanton Basel-Landschaft · Kreisgeometer

1. Die Grundbuchvermessung kann weiterhin durch private Geometer ausgeführt werden.

← § 28 Vertrag über die Aufnahme des bernischen Amtsbezirks Laufen und seiner Gemeinden Blauen, Brislach, Burg im Leimental, Dittingen, Duggingen, Grellingen, Laufen, Liesberg, Nenzlingen, Roggenburg, Röschenz, Wahlen, Zwingen in den Kanton Basel-Landschaft Volk und Gebiet § 30 Vertrag über die Aufnahme des bernischen Amtsbezirks Laufen und seiner Gemeinden Blauen, Brislach, Burg im Leimental, Dittingen, Duggingen, Grellingen, Laufen, Liesberg, Nenzlingen, Roggenburg, Röschenz, Wahlen, Zwingen in den Kanton Basel-Landschaft →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (561)

730.2024.330 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV)
Insurer Must Consider Appeal Despite Unclear Argument
The court found that the non-admission decision met the requirements of this article regarding the right to be heard and the necessary level of reasoning.
715.24.335 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV)
Insured Earnings Calculation Upheld Despite Incomplete Administrative Review
This article concerns the right to be heard, and its violation was considered a procedural issue in the decision.
715.2024.137 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 1 der Bundesverfassung der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft (BV))
Claimant v. Social Security Agency Regarding Benefit Suspension Delay
Cited in the reasoning to support the finding that the delay was not unjustified, by referencing the right to a decision within a reasonable time.
720.2024.95 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 1 BV)
Insurance Delay Claim Dismissed Due to Insufficient Medical Documentation
The court used this article to assess whether a violation of the right to be judged within a reasonable time (legal delay) occurred, which is the core issue of the appeal.
720.2024.95 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 1 BV)
Invalidity Benefit Application Delay Not Undue
The court used this provision to assess whether there was an undue delay in processing the case, as it guarantees the right to a decision within a reasonable time.
530.2024.24 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV)
Taxpayer's Withholding Tax Status and Right to Be Heard
Cited as the constitutional basis for the right to be heard, which was violated by the lower authority.
810.2024.170 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV)
Foreign National Denied Hardship Permit Due to Insufficient Compulsory Schooling and Lack of Severe Hardship
This constitutional provision, similar to § 22 VPO, underlies the requirement for a non-unpromising legal argument to obtain legal aid, and was considered in the denial of the applicant's request.
810.24.282 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV)
Father's Visitation Reduced Due to Alcohol and Inconsistent Attendance
Cited as the constitutional basis for granting free legal aid.
720.23.274 · bl (Art. 29 BV)
Remand for Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Assessments Due to Unreliable Medical Evidence
Guarantees the right to be heard, which includes the requirement for reasoned decisions to ensure that affected persons can challenge decisions appropriately.
460.24.67 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV)
Appeal Against Severe Bodily Harm Conviction - Sentence Reduction, Banishment Upheld
Cited regarding the requirement for a complete justification of the decision, stemming from the right to be heard.
460.24.67 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV)
Appeal Against Severe Bodily Harm Conviction - Sentence Reduction, Banishment Upheld
Cited regarding the right to compensation for necessary defense efforts.
400.24.265 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV)
Father's Appeal for Shared Custody Denied Due to Lack of Cooperation
Cited as a basis for the right to be heard.
810.2024.216 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 1 BV)
Mother's Appeal on Child Protection Jurisdiction and Recusal Denied
Cited as the constitutional basis for the right to a decision by an impartial administrative authority, which the provisions on recusal aim to concretize.
720.24.6 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV)
Invalidity Insurance Office Violated Right to be Heard
Cited as the constitutional basis for the right to be heard, which includes the right to comment on a decision that affects one's legal standing.
470.24.229 · bl (Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV)
Patient v. Prosecutor (Dentist Negligence Investigation)
The complainant is entitled to legal aid as they lack the financial means and their claim is not hopeless, and legal representation is necessary to safeguard their rights.