Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
101 CH-BL

§ 19 Vertrag über die Aufnahme des bernischen Amtsbezirks Laufen und seiner Gemeinden Blauen, Brislach, Burg im Leimental, Dittingen, Duggingen, Grellingen, Laufen, Liesberg, Nenzlingen, Roggenburg, Röschenz, Wahlen, Zwingen in den Kanton Basel-Landschaft - Organisation der Bezirkskommission

Allgemeine Bestimmungen - Behörden für die Übergangszeit
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (112 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

§ 19 Vertrag über die Aufnahme des bernischen Amtsbezirks Laufen und seiner Gemeinden Blauen, Brislach, Burg im Leimental, Dittingen, Duggingen, Grellingen, Laufen, Liesberg, Nenzlingen, Roggenburg, Röschenz, Wahlen, Zwingen in den Kanton Basel-Landschaft · Organisation der Bezirkskommission

1. Die Bezirkskommission setzt sich aus 26 vom Volk zu wählenden Mitgliedern zusammen, wobei die Gemeinden Wahlkreise bilden. Die Amtsdauer beträgt 4 Jahre. Wiederwahl ist zulässig.

2. Die bei Inkrafttreten dieses Vertrages laufende Amtsperiode wird bis zum Beginn der nächsten Legislaturperiode des basellandschaftlichen Landrates verlängert.

3. Bis zum Erlass eines neuen Organisationsstatuts finden die Bestimmungen des Organisationsstatuts Laufental vom 21. Oktober 1979 sinngemäss Anwendung.

← § 18 Vertrag über die Aufnahme des bernischen Amtsbezirks Laufen und seiner Gemeinden Blauen, Brislach, Burg im Leimental, Dittingen, Duggingen, Grellingen, Laufen, Liesberg, Nenzlingen, Roggenburg, Röschenz, Wahlen, Zwingen in den Kanton Basel-Landschaft Volk und Gebiet § 20 Vertrag über die Aufnahme des bernischen Amtsbezirks Laufen und seiner Gemeinden Blauen, Brislach, Burg im Leimental, Dittingen, Duggingen, Grellingen, Laufen, Liesberg, Nenzlingen, Roggenburg, Röschenz, Wahlen, Zwingen in den Kanton Basel-Landschaft →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (16)

2021.01.20.vv.2 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
School Transport Costs and Supervision Dispute
The court confirmed that the right to sufficient and free primary education also encompasses the right to a reasonable school commute, but found that this right was not violated in this case.
2020.10.14.vv.3 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Parents denied public funding for private special education.
Cited as the constitutional basis for the right to adequate and free basic education.
2020.02.19.vv.1 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Parents' School Transport Compensation Case
The court used this provision to establish the right to adequate and free basic education, which encompasses the school commute.
810.19.220 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Unreasonable School Transport Route Entitles Parents to Compensation
Cited as the basis for the right to adequate and free primary education, which includes the right to a reasonable school commute or support for it.
2019.01.30.vv.3 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Municipal Regulation on School Travel Costs Unconstitutionally Long Walking Distance
This article is cited as the legal basis for the right to sufficient and free primary education, which implicitly includes the right to a reasonable school commute.
810.18.2 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Municipality Regulation on School Commute Contributions Unconstitutional
The court used this provision to determine that Section 3 of the Regulation, by setting unrealistic distances for school routes, violated the right to sufficient and free primary education.
810.16.365 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
School District Obligated to Reinstate Dedicated School Bus Service
The court considered this provision in relation to the right to basic education and the right to a safe and reliable commute to school.
2017.05.17.vv.5 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Mother Denied Private School Funding Due to Refusal of Public School Options
This constitutional provision guarantees the right to adequate and free basic education. The court referenced it to explain the limits of this right, stating it does not guarantee the optimal or most suitable education.
2015.04.15.vv.2 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Subsidiarity Principle and Adequacy of Public Education Funding
The court referenced this provision to establish the general right to sufficient and free primary education, but ultimately found that it does not guarantee the optimal or most suitable education for a child, nor an automatic right to private schooling at state expense.
2015.02.11.vv.3 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Municipality Not Liable for Full Student Commute Costs.
The court used this article to establish the constitutional right to a reasonable school commute and the obligation of the school authority to ensure safe and timely transport, including potential cost coverage if the commute is unreasonable.
810.2014.245 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Right to Reasonable School Commute for Child's Education
The court affirmed the constitutional right to a reasonable school commute, which includes the right to have transport costs covered when the commute is excessively long or dangerous.
2014.03.19.vv.3 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Child's School Placement and Special Educational Needs
Cited to establish the constitutional right to adequate and free primary education, but not to the optimal or most suitable schooling.
2014.01.08.vv.2 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Public School System Adequate for Student with ADHD and Asperger's
The court considers the constitutional right to sufficient and free basic education when determining if the public school can offer adequate instruction.
2012.11.14.vv.1 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Student's Appeal for Special Educational Funding at Private School Denied
Cited to support the principle that children have a right to adequate and free basic education, relevant to the assessment of the claim for special support.
810.2010.448 · bl (Art. 19 BV)
Student's forced transfer unlawful due to parental misconduct and child's best interest.
The court used this article to qualify the parallel transfer as a concrete restriction of the right to sufficient and free primary education.