101
CH-BL
CH-BL
§ 104 Vertrag über die Aufnahme des bernischen Amtsbezirks Laufen und seiner Gemeinden Blauen, Brislach, Burg im Leimental, Dittingen, Duggingen, Grellingen, Laufen, Liesberg, Nenzlingen, Roggenburg, Röschenz, Wahlen, Zwingen in den Kanton Basel-Landschaft - Beiträge an die christ-katholische Kirchgemeinde
Besondere Bestimmungen - Finanzen - Beiträge
§ 104 Vertrag über die Aufnahme des bernischen Amtsbezirks Laufen und seiner Gemeinden Blauen, Brislach, Burg im Leimental, Dittingen, Duggingen, Grellingen, Laufen, Liesberg, Nenzlingen, Roggenburg, Röschenz, Wahlen, Zwingen in den Kanton Basel-Landschaft · Beiträge an die christ-katholische Kirchgemeinde
1. Zur Leistung von Beiträgen an die christ-katholische Kirchgemeinde Laufen schliessen die 3 Landeskirchen eine Vereinbarung über einen direkten Lastenausgleich ab.
← § 103 Vertrag über die Aufnahme des bernischen Amtsbezirks Laufen und seiner Gemeinden Blauen, Brislach, Burg im Leimental, Dittingen, Duggingen, Grellingen, Laufen, Liesberg, Nenzlingen, Roggenburg, Röschenz, Wahlen, Zwingen in den Kanton Basel-Landschaft
Volk und Gebiet
§ 105 Vertrag über die Aufnahme des bernischen Amtsbezirks Laufen und seiner Gemeinden Blauen, Brislach, Burg im Leimental, Dittingen, Duggingen, Grellingen, Laufen, Liesberg, Nenzlingen, Roggenburg, Röschenz, Wahlen, Zwingen in den Kanton Basel-Landschaft →
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (32)
61/2001/1 · sh (Art. 104 BV)
Grape Harvest Yield Regulation Review
The court cited this article as the basis in federal law that permitted the federal government to enact legislation allowing cantons to set specific yield limits.
BVGE-2018-IV-8 (Art. 104 al. 1 Cst.)
Landowner v. Cantonal Department of Agriculture
This constitutional article establishes the federal government's powers in agriculture, relevant for understanding the division of competences.
VPB 150000242 (Art. 104 Abs. 2 und 3 BV)
Agricultural worker family allowance financing does not violate equality principle
These provisions justify the different financing modalities for self-employed individuals in agriculture and outside agriculture based on agricultural structure policy, thereby preventing unconstitutional unequal treatment.
VPB 2001.2319 (Art. 104, al. 1, cst.)
Federal Council Response to Parliamentary Committee Recommendations on Agricultural Payments
Cited in relation to the constitutional requirements for agriculture, including resource conservation, landscape maintenance, and decentralized land use, which are considered in the assessment of structural improvement projects.
B-3184/2023 (Art. 104 Abs. 3 Bst. a BV)
Farmer's Biodiversity Payment Dispute: Quality Levels I and II
Cited as the constitutional basis for direct payments to agricultural holdings.
A/773/2023 · ge (art. 104 al. 1 let. a Cst.)
Winegrower Appeal on Vineyard Suitability Denied Due to Slope and Orientation
Cited in the reasoning as the constitutional basis for the preservation of agricultural land (SDA).
B-1064/2020 (Art. 104 cpv. 3 Cost.)
Farmer's Appeal on Direct Payments and Slope Contributions Partially Granted
Cited as the constitutional basis for direct payments to farmers for multifunctional agricultural contributions.
B-2179/2019 (Art. 104 Abs. 2 Bst. a BV)
Farmer's Appeal on Agricultural Payment Reduction Dismissed Due to Inconsistent Nutrient Balance Calculation
Cited as the constitutional basis for direct payments to support farming.
B-649/2016 (Art. 104 Abs. 2 BV)
Farmer's Direct Payment Eligibility Denied Due to Lack of Entrepreneurial Risk
Constitutional basis for federal direct payments for agriculture.
VVGE.2011.13.Nr.42 · ow (Art. 104 BV)
Agricultural Lease Termination Dispute is a Civil Matter
Cited in the context of the objectives of Swiss agricultural policy.
Plainte.2016.19 · vd (Art. 104 al. 3 let. a Cst.)
Cantonal Court Upholds Seizure of Agricultural Payments in Debt Enforcement
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the nature of direct payments, though the final order was inadmissibility.
B-2261/2014 (Art. 104 Abs. 2 BV)
Farmer appeals agricultural payment deductions for welfare and environmental breaches dismissed.
Cited as the constitutional basis for direct payments in agriculture.
B-4248/2013 (art. 104 Cst.)
Farmer's Pigsty Appeal Denied: One Agricultural Operation Per Property Rule Upheld
Cited as the constitutional basis for agricultural policy, supporting the restriction of economic freedom and property rights for public interest.
B-4248/2013 (art. 104 al. 2 Cst.)
Farmer's Pigsty Appeal Denied: One Agricultural Operation Per Property Rule Upheld
Cited to justify restrictions on economic freedom in agriculture for public interest.
B-4248/2013 (art. 104 al. 3 let. f Cst.)
Farmer's Pigsty Appeal Denied: One Agricultural Operation Per Property Rule Upheld
Cited as a legal basis for restricting property rights in rural areas.