Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
930.11 HGVOCI CH-BE

Art. 5 Verordnung über Handel und Gewerbe (HGV) - Tourismusorte

Ladenöffnungszeiten
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (25 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 5 Verordnung über Handel und Gewerbe (HGV) · Tourismusorte

1. Als Tourismusorte gemäss Artikel 12 HGG gelten

1. Adelboden,

2. Aeschi bei Spiez,

3. Beatenberg,

4. Boltigen,

5. Bönigen,

6. Brienz,

7. Därligen,

8. Diemtigen,

9. Frutigen,

10. **\* ...

11. Grindelwald,

12. Gsteig,

13. Guttannen,

14. Habkern,

15. Hasliberg,

16. Heiligenschwendi,

16a. **\* Hofstetten bei Brienz,

17. Innertkirchen,

18. Interlaken,

19. Iseltwald,

19a. **\* Kandergrund,

20. Kandersteg,

21. Krattigen,

22. Lauenen,

23. Lauterbrunnen,

24. Leissigen,

25. **\* Lenk,

26. Lütschental,

27. **\* Matten bei Interlaken,

28. Meiringen,

29. Niederried bei Interlaken,

30. Oberried am Brienzersee,

31. **\* Reichenbach im Kandertal,

32. Ringgenberg,

33. Saanen,

34. Sigriswil,

35. Schattenhalb,

36. St. Stephan,

37. Unterseen,

38. **\* Wilderswil,

39. Zweisimmen.

← Art. 4 Verordnung über Handel und Gewerbe (HGV) Gegenstand Art. 6 Verordnung über Handel und Gewerbe (HGV) →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (11)

C-4817/2021 (Art. 5 Abs. 1 PrSG)
Distributor's Mask Ban Upheld Due to Safety Standard Non-Compliance
Requires the party placing a product on the market to be able to prove that it meets the fundamental safety and health requirements.
C-3808/2020 (Art. 5 Abs. 1 PrSG)
Breathing Apparatus Safety Standards Dispute
Obliges the party placing the product on the market to prove compliance with safety and health requirements.
BVGE-2018-V-5 (Art. 5 Abs. 2 PrSG)
Manufacturer fails to prove safety of aerial work platforms with composite baskets.
This provision establishes the presumption of conformity with essential safety and health requirements when a product is manufactured according to technical standards, and its application or rebuttal is central to the decision.
C-6202/2016 (Art. 5 Abs. 2 PrSG)
Manufacturer's Composite Basket Strength Calculations Deemed Insufficient
Used to state that if a product is manufactured according to technical standards, it is presumed to meet the basic safety and health requirements.
C-6202/2016 (Art. 5 Abs. 3 PrSG)
Manufacturer's Composite Basket Strength Calculations Deemed Insufficient
Used to explain that if a product does not comply with technical standards, the manufacturer must prove that it meets the basic safety and health requirements in another way.
C-914/2013 (Art. 5 Abs. 2 PrSG)
Garage Door Closing Force Compliance Case
This provision establishes a presumption that a product meets safety requirements if manufactured according to harmonized technical standards, which can be rebutted by evidence to the contrary.
C-914/2013 (Art. 5 Abs. 3 PrSG)
Garage Door Closing Force Compliance Case
This provision requires the manufacturer to prove that a product meets safety requirements if it does not comply with technical standards or if the presumption of conformity is rebutted.
C-2016/2014 (Art. 5 Abs. 2 PrSG)
Company Not Barred from Marketing Quick Couplers
This provision establishes a presumption that a product manufactured according to harmonized technical standards meets the essential safety and health requirements.
C-2257/2014 (Art. 5 Abs. 2 PrSG)
European Safety Standard Validates Quick Coupler Sales
Establishes the presumption that a product manufactured according to harmonized technical standards meets the basic safety and health requirements.
C-2330/2014 (Art. 5 Abs. 2 PrSG)
Court Lifts Ban on Excavator Quick Couplers, Citing Safety Standard Compliance
Used to establish the presumption of conformity with essential safety and health requirements when a product is manufactured according to technical standards.
C-6412/2012 (Art. 5 Abs. 1 PrSG)
Prohibition on Stencil Machine Upheld, Broader Ban Rejected Over Inadequate Risk Assessment
Obligation for the person placing a product on the market to prove compliance with fundamental safety and health requirements.