155.21
VRPGLPJALGA
CH-BE
CH-BE
Art. 110 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRPG) - 5. bei Rückzug, Abstand oder Gegenstandslosigkeit
Kosten - Grundsätze der Kostenverlegung
Art. 110 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRPG) · 5. bei Rückzug, Abstand oder Gegenstandslosigkeit
Wer ein Gesuch, eine Klage oder ein Rechtsmittel zurückzieht, den Abstand erklärt oder auf andere Weise dafür sorgt, dass das Verfahren gegenstandslos wird, gilt als unterliegende Partei.
Wird ein Verfahren ohne Zutun einer Partei gegenstandslos, so sind die Verfahrens- und Parteikosten nach den abgeschätzten Prozessaussichten zu verlegen. Die Verfahrens- und Parteikosten können aus Billigkeitsgründen dem Gemeinwesen auferlegt werden.
Mit Zustimmung der instruierenden Behörde können die Parteien Abweichendes vereinbaren.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (157)
100 2019 5 · be (Art. 110 VRPG)
Ukrainian National Residence Permit Denial Mootness and Lawyer Compensation Dispute
Cited regarding the allocation of litigation costs when the appeal became moot due to the appellant's departure.
100 2017 99 · be (Art. 110 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Deceased Applicant's Residence Permit Appeal Declared Moot
Mentioned as the basis for determining cost allocation when a party caused the case to become moot (though ultimately Art. 110 Abs. 2 was applied).
100 2017 99 · be (Art. 110 Abs. 2 VRPG)
Deceased Applicant's Residence Permit Appeal Declared Moot
The basis for allocating costs according to estimated probability of success because the case became moot due to the death of the party.
100 2022 359 · be (Art. 110 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Construction Company v. Cantonal Building Authority (Flight Safety Modifications)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the parties' ability to dispose of costs, which forms the basis for accepting the cost agreement in the dispositive.
100 2022 359 · be (Art. 110 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Construction Company v. Cantonal Building Authority (Flight Safety Modifications)
The court applied the parties' agreement on costs as per the settlement agreement, referencing this rule concerning the deviation from statutory cost allocation principles (reasoning leads to Order 3 & 4).
110 2023 125 · be (Art. 110 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Administrative Board Upholds Municipal Building Permit for Telecommunications Mast Reconstruction Despite Procedural Error
Cited in the reasoning explaining why parties who withdraw their appeal are considered the losing party for cost allocation purposes.
110 2024 135 · be (Art. 110 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Building Permit Modification and Appeal Settlement Regarding Heat Pump Installation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the cost allocation principle applicable to the settlement reached by the parties.
110 2024 135 · be (Art. 110 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Building Permit Modification and Appeal Settlement Regarding Heat Pump Installation
The principle of cost allocation based on agreement between parties, which governed the court's cost decision (explicitly cited in the reasoning section related to costs).
110 2024 135 · be (Art. 110 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Building Permit Modification and Appeal Settlement Regarding Heat Pump Installation
Used to determine the allocation of procedural costs based on the parties' agreement.
120 2025 9 · be (Art. 110 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Appeal Regarding Sealing Order, Usage Ban, and Procedural Costs for Short-Term Rentals
Cited to determine that the appellants are considered the losing party regarding the partial dismissal due to mootness, thus denying them party costs.
120 2024 52 · be (Art. 110 al. 1 LPJA)
Co-Owners Appeal Costs Assessment After Partial Reversal of Privacy Screen Removal Order
Cited to consider the appellant as the losing party regarding the parts of the appeal that were withdrawn.
100 2024 271 · be (Art. 110 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Co-owners' Ambiguous Submission Regarding Building Permit and Misconduct Allegations
Used to define that the Beschwerdeführende are considered the losing party because their conduct led to the dropping (Gegenstandslosigkeit) of the administrative review procedure.
110 2024 107 · be (Art. 110 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Appeal of Building Permit Moot Due to Revised Plans and Subsequent Approval
This article defines the losing party in case of procedural mootness, referenced when discussing cost allocation.
110 2024 107 · be (Art. 110 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Appeal of Building Permit Moot Due to Revised Plans and Subsequent Approval
This article allows parties to agree on deviating cost allocation rules, which was the basis for accepting the parties' agreement on costs.
100 2024 52 · be (Art. 110 VRPG)
Tax Treatment of Capital Gains from Agricultural Zone Property Used for Ancillary Business
Cited in conjunction with Art. 200 StG to declare the appeal concerning cantonal taxes moot (Order 2).