Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Sklep II DoR 185/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.185.2009 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses review request due to non-fulfillment of Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act conditions.

Geschäftsnummer Sklep II DoR 185/2009
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Slowenien (SI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's request to allow a review of the first-instance judgment. The defendant sought to overturn a ruling ordering them to pay 8,697.28 EUR plus statutory interest to the plaintiff. The court denied the request because the specific conditions required to permit a review under Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act were not met.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; A review request is inadmissible if the conditions for its admissibility under Article 367a are not fulfilled.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
review request admissibility Civil Procedure Act supreme court jurisdiction statutory interest claim procedural dismissal Rechtsvorschlag Betreibungsfähigkeit Revisionsgrund

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 367c, paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Act
KI-generiert
VSRS Sklep II DoR 38/2019
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to case value exceeding statutory threshold.
Sklep III DoR 24/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal on lease termination and unjust enrichment conditions in Slovenian civil procedure.
Sodba II Ips 360/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal claiming insufficient non-pecuniary damages for physical pain and mental distress after a fall.
Sodba III Ips 77/2011
Slovenian Supreme Court rejects appeal on warranty claim timing, ruling no statute of limitations applies to defense objections.
Sodba II Ips 719/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court failed to explain witness non-hearing but appellate court justified evidence rejection as non-essential.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Toženec je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo pritožbenega sodišča, s katero je bila potrjena sodba sodišča prve stopnje, ki ga zavezuje toženi stranki plačati 8.697,28 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 24. 11. 2006 do plačila.

2. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena istega zakona).