Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Sklep II DoR 169/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.169.2009 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed review request as statutory conditions for admissibility were not met.

Geschäftsnummer Sklep II DoR 169/2009
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Slowenien (SI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the plaintiffs' request for permission to file a review against the second-instance judgment. The plaintiffs argued for compensation, but the second-instance court upheld the first-instance dismissal of their claim. The court denied the review because the specific conditions required by Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review request is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for its admissibility are not fulfilled.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
review request admissibility conditions Code of Civil Procedure supreme court dismissal of claim Revisionsgründe Begründung einer Praxisänderung Rechtsvorschlag

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure
KI-generiert
Sklep II DoR 237/2011
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request because court fee was paid after the legal deadline expired.
Sklep III DoR 109/2010
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal request for most questions due to procedural defects and lack of importance.
Sklep III DoR 36/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether a contract terminated before bankruptcy counts as a mutual breach under ZFPPIPP Article 24.
Sklep X Ips 92/2012
Supreme Court dismisses appeal claiming procedural merger is a significant legal issue under ZUS-1.
Sklep III DoR 31/2014
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding legal basis for compensation and civil penalty calculation for public broadcasting of sound recordings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP niso izpolnjeni, je VS RS predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena ZPP).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožniki so vložili predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje, s katero je bila potrjena sodba prvostopenjskega sodišča o zavrnitvi njihovega odškodninskega tožbenega zahtevka.

2. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso izpolnjeni, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena istega zakona).