Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Sklep II DoR 162/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.162.2009 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed appeal permission request due to non-fulfillment of statutory conditions under Civil Procedure Act.

Geschäftsnummer Sklep II DoR 162/2009
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Slowenien (SI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to appeal, upholding the lower court's judgment ordering compensation payments. The applicant argued for a review, but the court found that the legal prerequisites for granting such permission under the Civil Procedure Act were not met. Consequently, the decision was based on the strict statutory requirements for appellate review, which the applicant failed to satisfy.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

367.a(1) CPP; 367.c(2) CPP: A request for permission to appeal is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for granting such permission are not fulfilled.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
permission to appeal Civil Procedure Act statutory conditions dismissed request appellate review Berechnung der Schadenersatzforderung Schadenersatzzahlung Verzugskosten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
367.a(1) of the Civil Procedure Act
367.c(2) of the Civil Procedure Act
KI-generiert
VSL sodba I Cp 2416/2014
Court dismisses defamation claim against satirical article, upholding freedom of expression limits.
VSL Sklep II Cp 2411/2017
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay defendant's legal costs despite procedural objections.
VDSS sodba Pdp 471/2014
Workplace injury claim dismissed; employee's own unsafe climbing caused accident without employer liability.
Sodba in sklep II Ips 406/2006
Civil court dismisses appeal on property damages due to statutory limits but allows appeal on non-property damages.
VSL sodba II Cp 453/2009
Civil court dismissed appeal, bound by final criminal verdict on accident facts until criminal case is reopened.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni zakonski pogoji, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo toženkino pritožbo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje, po kateri je vsakemu od tožnikov dolžna plačati odškodnino v višini 2.086,46 EUR z zahtevanimi obrestmi in jima povrniti stroške postopka.

2. Zoper navedeno sodbo je toženka vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku)