Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
UPRS sklep U 1372/2000 ECLI:SI:UPRS:2002:U.1372.2000 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of lawsuit deemed inadmissible after court judgment became legally binding.

Geschäftsnummer UPRS sklep U 1372/2000
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Slowenien (SI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request to withdraw the lawsuit after the first-instance judgment had already become legally binding. The plaintiff submitted a withdrawal application on November 5, 2002, following a prior warning, but the court rejected it as untimely. Since the withdrawal was submitted after the judgment became final, the court ruled that the withdrawal is treated as if the lawsuit had been filed too late under Article 32 of the Administrative Dispute Act.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Article 32 of the Administrative Dispute Act; Article 34 of the Administrative Dispute Act: A withdrawal of a lawsuit submitted after the court's decision has become legally binding is treated as an untimely filed lawsuit and is therefore inadmissible.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
withdrawal of lawsuit legally binding judgment untimely filing administrative dispute act procedural deadline final decision inadmissible application

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Article 32 of the Administrative Dispute Act
Article 34 of the Administrative Dispute Act

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Umik tožbe se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Umik tožbe, podan po odločitvi sodišča (32. člen ZUS), se obravnava smiselno enako kot prepozno vložena tožba.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Tožeča stranka je Upravnemu sodišču RS dne 5. 11. 2002 poslala vlogo - ugovor zoper opomin, v katerem navaja, da umika tožbo.

Vlogo stranke je sodišče ob smiselni uporabi 34. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu (Uradni list RS št. 50/97 in 70/00, v nadaljevanju: ZUS) zavrglo kot prepozno, saj je stranka tožbo umaknila po tem, ko je sodišče o tožbi že odločilo s sodbo in sklepom opr. št. U 1372/2000-12 z dne 5. 9. 2002, ki sta dne 5. 10. 2002 postala pravnomočna. Po določbi 32. člena ZUS namreč lahko tožnik umakne tožbo le do odločitve sodišča.