Transfer of venue application rejected as moot following the prior resolution of the underlying case by the competent court
Rumänien (RO)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the application for transfer of venue, leaving the original jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal of Călărași intact without appeal. The applicant sought to move the case from the Court of Appeal of Călărași, but the application was rendered moot because the underlying case had already been adjudicated on 12 April 2012, prior to the hearing. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural requirement that a request for transfer of venue must have a pending case as its subject matter; since the original proceeding was no longer active, the application lacked a viable object and was rejected as surplusage.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 93 al. 1 LTF; Transfer of venue application rejected as moot following the prior resolution of the underlying case by the competent court: The applicant sought to move the case from the Court of Appeal of Călărași, but the application was rendered moot because the underlying case had already been adjudicated on 12 April 2012, prior to the hearing. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural requirement that a request for transfer of venue must have a pending case as its subject matter; since the original proceeding was no longer active, the application lacked a viable object and was rejected as surplusage.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for the main ground of the verdict, explicitly cited in the dispositive to justify the dismissal of the application for transfer of venue due to the prior resolution of the underlying case.
Volltext
S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petenta E.V.
La apelul nominal a răspuns petenta E.V., personal lipsind intimații F.C., M.C.C., M.C., T.A., C.A., N.M., N.L., N.L., N.V., M.G. și A.L.A..
Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror L.V.
Procedura legal îndeplinită.
Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor Dosarul nr. 657/116/2012 al Tribunalului Călărași, a cărui strămutare se solicită, a fost soluționat la data de 12 aprilie 2012. Se mai referă faptul că petenta a depus o petiție intitulată „întâmpinare" prin care solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare.
Petenta E.V., având cuvântul, solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare.
Reprezentanta Ministerului Public solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare, ca rămasă fără obiect.
Analizând cererea,
ÎNALTA CURTE
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
D I S P U N E
Respinge cererea formulată de petenta E.V. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 657/116/2012 al Tribunalului Călărași.
Fără cale de atac.
Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 14 mai 2012.
Procesat de GGC - AS